2020 7th International Conference on Signal Processing and Integrated Networks (SPIN) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/spin48934.2020.9071156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Modified Incremental Conductance Maximum Power Point Technique for Standalone PV System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, the disadvantages of the InC algorithm are also overcome by combining the InC algorithm with the GWO algorithm-based PID controller to minimize steadystate oscillations at the MPP. The obtained results show the effectiveness of the improved InC algorithm with a reduction of steady-state oscillations around the MPP as well as better tracking performance of the MPP of the PV module [37]. In addition, the fixed step size in the InC algorithm is also improved by an adaptive step size with variations.…”
Section: Siaw-pso Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, the disadvantages of the InC algorithm are also overcome by combining the InC algorithm with the GWO algorithm-based PID controller to minimize steadystate oscillations at the MPP. The obtained results show the effectiveness of the improved InC algorithm with a reduction of steady-state oscillations around the MPP as well as better tracking performance of the MPP of the PV module [37]. In addition, the fixed step size in the InC algorithm is also improved by an adaptive step size with variations.…”
Section: Siaw-pso Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Additionally, the MPP of a PV module on the voltagecurrent (U-I) and voltage-power (U-P) characteristics should also be determined and updated to ensure that the PV module is always operated adaptively and optimally under various operational conditions. There are currently many techniques applied to determine MPPs of the PV modules such as PO algorithms [34], [35] and InC algorithms [36], [37]. Several previous studies show that the PO algorithm exhibits disadvantages such as oscillations around the MPP in steadystate conditions, deviations from the MPP in quickly changing conditions of the irradiance and temperature and requirements of an appropriate perturbation step size [38].…”
Section: Siaw-pso Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These MPPT techniques can be divided into three types: conventional, artificial-intelligence (AI), and hybrid-based techniques. Constant voltage control (CVC) (Kumar et al, 2014;Derbeli et al, 2021), Hill-Climbing (Jordehi, 2016;Amir et al, 2017;Pavithra et al, 2021), Perturb & Observe (P&O) (Esram and Chapman, 2007;Yilmaz et al, 2019;Mousa et al, 2021), Sliding Mode Control (SMC) based MPPT technique (Ahmed and Salam, 2016), Incremental Conductance (IC) (Li and Wang, 2009;Kumar et al, 2014;Mamarelis et al, 2014;Bendib et al, 2015), incremental resistance (IR) based MPPT (Chauhan et al, 2020), and fractional voltage/current (Elbaset et al, 2015) are conventional techniques having less complex behavior and are easy to implement. Among these, P&O and IC algorithms are more prevalent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed technique is simple and efficient but the drawback is that it cannot be applied in dynamically changing conditions and also its use is limited to low power application. According to Chauhan et al [14] overcomes this limitation to some extent where a modified IC algorithm has been proposed by optimizing the controller gain through Grey Wolf technique. However, results are satisfactory only for insolation variation and that too over a small scale only, as dynamic change of other parameters introduces a truncated error.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%