The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 9:30 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 1 hour.
2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.newast.2008.08.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A modified genetic algorithm for precise determination the geometrical orbital elements of binary stars

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The following subsections will show the results achieved by the proposed ACDE Table 2 Comparison results (Bertiau 1957;Charbonneau 2002) approach. Whenever possible, comparisons carried out with various published techniques (Bertiau 1957;Charbonneau 2002;Attia et al 2009). Table 2 shows a comparison between the values of different parameters of the x vector …”
Section: Simulation Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The following subsections will show the results achieved by the proposed ACDE Table 2 Comparison results (Bertiau 1957;Charbonneau 2002) approach. Whenever possible, comparisons carried out with various published techniques (Bertiau 1957;Charbonneau 2002;Attia et al 2009). Table 2 shows a comparison between the values of different parameters of the x vector …”
Section: Simulation Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equation (12) is a transcendental in E and is solved by the bisection method for nonlinear root derived in Attia et al (2009).…”
Section: Observations and Reduction Of Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where f is the fitness value of the solution; f 0 is the larger of the fitness values of the solutions to be crossed; Downloaded by [Umeå University Library] at 11:54 18 November 2014 f is the average fitness value of the population; f max is the maximum fitness value of the population, and k 1 ; k 2 ; k 3 ; k 4 Ä 1:0; and f min is the minimum fitness value of the population The AGAPOP technique is a standard GA-based technique with modifications to reduce the huge time consumed in calculations with a relatively small improvement in accuracy [24]. As the name implies, the AGAPOP technique consists of two parts: the AGA procedure and the "POP" procedure.…”
Section: The Agapopmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EB data fitting is a highly non-linear problem that suffers from degenerate solutions: the right combination of the wrong parameters can often fit the observed data as well as the actual solution. The algorithms currently in use, namely Differential Corrections (DC), Powell (1964)'s direction set method, Nelder & Mead (1965)'s Simplex method (NMS), and genetic algorithms (Attia et al 2009), have all met with success, but cannot be run robustly without experienced human intervention, making the tools fully manual.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%