2017
DOI: 10.1101/115345
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A modified GC-specific MAKER gene annotation method reveals improved and novel gene predictions of high and low GC content inOryza sativa

Abstract: 3Accurate structural annotation depends on well-trained gene prediction programs.

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 43 publications
(48 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gene prediction was further performed by training SNAP (library 2013‐02‐16) (Korf, 2004 ) and AUGUSTUS v3.3 (Stanke and Morgenstern, 2005 ) as suggested in Bowman et al. ( 2017 ) and the output of the first round of MAKER annotation. After gene prediction the genes in the gff file were renamed and the file was split to produce one gff for each phase.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gene prediction was further performed by training SNAP (library 2013‐02‐16) (Korf, 2004 ) and AUGUSTUS v3.3 (Stanke and Morgenstern, 2005 ) as suggested in Bowman et al. ( 2017 ) and the output of the first round of MAKER annotation. After gene prediction the genes in the gff file were renamed and the file was split to produce one gff for each phase.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%