2002
DOI: 10.1053/jhsu.2002.32953
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A modified end-to-side method for peripheral nerve repair: Large epineurial window helicoid technique versus small epineurial window standard end-to-side technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
47
1
3

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
47
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…71 Accordingly, the structure and function of muscles innervated by the donor nerve and the donor nerve itself completely recovered at 6-12 months after surgery. 53,66,69,72,73 Together, these observations support the view that end-to-side nerve coaptation has no major detrimental long-term effect on the donor nerve. This is in accordance with two recent reports of clinical case series, 18,22 in which none of patients had any sensory or motor loss in the innervation zone of the donor nerve, even though perineurial sutures were made after the creation of a perineurial window in the donor nerve.…”
supporting
confidence: 61%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…71 Accordingly, the structure and function of muscles innervated by the donor nerve and the donor nerve itself completely recovered at 6-12 months after surgery. 53,66,69,72,73 Together, these observations support the view that end-to-side nerve coaptation has no major detrimental long-term effect on the donor nerve. This is in accordance with two recent reports of clinical case series, 18,22 in which none of patients had any sensory or motor loss in the innervation zone of the donor nerve, even though perineurial sutures were made after the creation of a perineurial window in the donor nerve.…”
supporting
confidence: 61%
“…51 Similarly, regardless of the way in which the connective tissue sheaths were breached, the majority of other studies demonstrated focal Wallerian degeneration in the donor nerve distal from the site of coaptation at the first few weeks after the end-to-side nerve coaptation, but not 2-3 months later. 32,48,54,57,66,69,70 Accordingly, we found significant focal subepineurial degenerative changes in donor nerves with epiperineurial breaching only at 4 weeks, but not at 8 weeks. As shown in our recent longitudinal study, the differences between the donor and control nerves regarding the number of myelinated axons are not statistically significant beyond 4 months after suturing the end-to-side nerve coaptation without windowing the donor nerve connective tissue.…”
mentioning
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, the minimal injury to donor nerve during the nerve suturing process promoted the releasing of some nerve growth factors, and therefore regeneration occurred (Lutz et al, 2000;Yamauchi et al, 2000). Second, the angle at the coaptation site may have facilitated axons' growth into the recipient nerve (Yan et al, 2002). Third, the surface area of coaptation between the donor nerve and the recipient nerve was increased greatly by trimming the end of the distal stump of L6 VR diagonally, and using the helicoid neurorrhaphy (Yan et al, 2002).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, the slight damage to the donor nerve led to the release of some nerve growth factors which promoted regeneration during the nerve anastomosis [66]. The use of helicoid coaptation greatly increased the surface area of donor nerve and the recipient nerve, which contributed to nerve regeneration [67]. In addition, there are other factors that also influenced nerve regeneration including neurotrophic factors, timing of coaptation and the number of Schwann cells at the anastomosis site [68].…”
Section: The Advantages Of Terminolateral Neurorrhaphy Of Autonomic-smentioning
confidence: 99%