2017
DOI: 10.1097/gox.0000000000001213
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Modified Dual-plane Technique Using the Serratus Anterior Fascia in Primary Breast Augmentation

Abstract: Background:Breast augmentations are commonly performed aesthetic surgical procedures. As the breast is a changeable structure, the ideal location of an implant would be a plane that can adjust to the dynamic changes of the breast. We present a modified dual-plane technique for breast augmentation using the fascia for thin patients.Methods:Between June 2014 and June 2015, 27 patients with small breasts underwent breast augmentation using the modified dual-plane technique. The average age was 29.4 years (range, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(34 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Prior to surgery, the participating patients were randomized into one of two study groups (Scheme 1). The two groups were: Group 1 (the “standard control group”): These patients received standard postoperative pain control with IV opioids, NSAIDs and acetaminophen (paracetamol).Group 2 (the “block group”): Immediately after induction of anesthesia and positioning for surgery, these patients received ultrasound-guided SAP block (a single injection of 0.25% bupivacaine hydrochloride 2 mg/kg plus dexamethasone 8 mg) 1113. These patients also received the standard postoperative pain control regimen.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Prior to surgery, the participating patients were randomized into one of two study groups (Scheme 1). The two groups were: Group 1 (the “standard control group”): These patients received standard postoperative pain control with IV opioids, NSAIDs and acetaminophen (paracetamol).Group 2 (the “block group”): Immediately after induction of anesthesia and positioning for surgery, these patients received ultrasound-guided SAP block (a single injection of 0.25% bupivacaine hydrochloride 2 mg/kg plus dexamethasone 8 mg) 1113. These patients also received the standard postoperative pain control regimen.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Group 2 (the “block group”): Immediately after induction of anesthesia and positioning for surgery, these patients received ultrasound-guided SAP block (a single injection of 0.25% bupivacaine hydrochloride 2 mg/kg plus dexamethasone 8 mg). 11 13 These patients also received the standard postoperative pain control regimen. We used the Linear 6–13 MHz probe for ultrasound-guided block.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This reverse dual plane ensures the thickness and supports the strength of the soft tissue that covers the lower pole of the implants. 21 , 22 Some adverse consequences of subfascial or subglandular implant placement may decrease, such as increased mastoptosis, enlargement of the areolas, palpability of the implants, and capsular contracture. 19-22 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aesthetically a muscular layer camouflages implant edges and minimises the appearance of rippling particularly in leaner patients but an underdeveloped pocket may compress the implant and create a more pronounced rippling effect. The pectoralis muscle would often not be adequate to completely cover the implant and recruiting either serratus anterior or rectus abdominis would be required to provide lower pole coverage [38]. Importantly a submuscular plane was shown to have the lowest incidence of capsular contraction when compared to other implant pocket positions [39].…”
Section: Intraoperative Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%