2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2015.08.111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A modified approach to numerical solution of Fredholm integral equations of the second kind

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This method is also being used by both Panda and Martha et el. [2] and Bhattacharya and Mondal [3] and they approximated the solution in terms of linear combination of Lagrange's and Bernstein polynomials respectively. All of them have found excellent agreement in approximate solution with exact solution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method is also being used by both Panda and Martha et el. [2] and Bhattacharya and Mondal [3] and they approximated the solution in terms of linear combination of Lagrange's and Bernstein polynomials respectively. All of them have found excellent agreement in approximate solution with exact solution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…( 2015 ), Okayama et al. ( 2011 ), Panda ( 2013 ), Javidi and Golbabai ( 2009 ), Ghorbani and Saberi-Nadjafi ( 2006 ), Mohamad Nor et al. ( 2013 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To improve the efficiency of the HPM, a few modifications have been made by many researches. For instance, Javidi and Golbabai ( 2009 ) added the accelerating parameter to the perturbation equation for obtaining the approximate solution for nonlinear Fredholm integral equation. Ghorbani and Saberi-Nadjafi ( 2006 ) added a series of parameter and selective functions to HPM to find the semi-analytical solutions of nonlinear Fredholm and Volterra integral equations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…u x y x y = We use the present method to approximate the exact solution of two-dimensional integral equation. We compare the absolution errors obtained by the present method and the method in [6] and the method in [7] for different n . Form the Tab.1, it is easy to find that when 6 n = the method in [6] is better than the present method, but with the increase of n the present method can reach a higher accuracy than the method in [6] and the method in [7].…”
Section: Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A modified interpolation method and Nystrom method have been introduced in [6,7]. In [6], the author has presented an approach which is different and more general as well as more efficient than the Nystöm method, in the sense that Nystöm method becomes a particular case of the method developed here. Imran et al in [8] developed the haar wavelet method for the numerical solutions of two-dimensional nonlinear integral equations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%