1954
DOI: 10.1002/jctb.5010040108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A modification of Trouton's rule

Abstract: Trouton's rule is modified to allow for the fact that the entropy of vaporization is generally a function of the Guldberg ratio and the parachor‐critical volume ratio. The medification has the advantage that it is applicable to non‐associated substances of low boiling‐point, and furnishes a rational basis for their classification into normal and abnormal liquids. Moreover, a high value of the medified ratio is diagnostic of association in the liquid state.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 5 shows the entropy of vaporization S vap of some organic compouds calculated using eqn (20). 26,140,142…”
Section: Entropy Correction In the Solution Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Table 5 shows the entropy of vaporization S vap of some organic compouds calculated using eqn (20). 26,140,142…”
Section: Entropy Correction In the Solution Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the Trouton rule 26,27 and its modifications, [139][140][141][142][143][144][145] the entropy difference between the gas phase and solution is ca. 21.0 cal mol À1 K À1 for most organic materials, which is expressed in modern terms as follows 146 DH vap…”
Section: Entropy Correction In the Solution Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The prediction of either entropy change, however, is another matter. A variety of quantities on which the entropy changes might depend have been proposed: DH ;pp b [7], the critical temperature and volume [8,9], the sum of atomic number [10], T b [11], molecular mass [11], molecular volume [12][13][14][15][16], symmetry number [17], number of torsions [17], the extent of planarity [17], or type of functional group [18]. None of these, though, have had a firm enough combination of simplicity, accuracy, and a sound theoretical basis to surpass Hildebrand's rule let alone Trouton's rule.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%