2015
DOI: 10.1080/13658816.2015.1009464
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A modification of the time-geographic framework to support temporal flexibility in ‘fixed’ activities

Abstract: The time-geographic distinction between fixed and flexible activities is widely acknowledged to be a somewhat arbitrary dichotomy but is still the current modus operandi for time-geographic calculations. This paper proposes a modification of the classic time-geographic framework to support temporal flexibility in 'fixed' activities. This modification is crucial for time-geographic calculations on public transit networks with a low frequency of service, which would otherwise return unstable results.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are only travel time uncertainties about whether the transport services will be able to follow the time tables according to the schedule. This would be equivalent to considering the boarding of passengers at public transport stops as spatially fixed and temporally flexible activities (Charleux, 2015). As a result, some concepts from time geography such as space-time prism and potential path area might not be directly applicable to the study of conventional public transport systems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are only travel time uncertainties about whether the transport services will be able to follow the time tables according to the schedule. This would be equivalent to considering the boarding of passengers at public transport stops as spatially fixed and temporally flexible activities (Charleux, 2015). As a result, some concepts from time geography such as space-time prism and potential path area might not be directly applicable to the study of conventional public transport systems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are only travel time uncertainties about whether the transport services will be able to follow the timetables according to the schedule. This would be equivalent to considering the boarding of passengers at public transport stops as spatially fixed and temporally flexible activities (Charleux, 2015). As a result, some concepts from time geography such as spacetime prism and potential path area might not be directly applicable to the study of conventional public transport systems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RI can be identified as the time interval with the occurrence equal to or larger than the threshold. However, defining thresholds that can characterize the repetitive intervals is challenging due to the uncertainty or inherent flexibility of activities in a person’s everyday schedule (Schwanen et al 2008 ; Charleux 2015 ). Hence, we define threshold from a data-driven perspective.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Kuijpers et al ( 2010 ) proposed the ‘anchor region’ with a probability distribution on the possible locations of anchor points to represent the variation of anchors’ spatial locations. For the temporal aspect, Charleux ( 2015 ) modified the temporal attribute of an anchor by using the earliest starting and latest ending times with a duration. These analytical models can perform more realistic modeling of anchored activities that allow some flexibility in their definitions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%