1955
DOI: 10.2307/1418530
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Modification of the Method of Equal-Appearing Intervals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1957
1957
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another common problem with category scales is that subjects tend not to use the end categories [ 18,49]. This &dquo;category end effect&dquo; results in seven-point category scales being functionally reduced to five-point scales, five-point scales to three-point scales, etc.…”
Section: Psychophysical Scaling Of Comfortmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another common problem with category scales is that subjects tend not to use the end categories [ 18,49]. This &dquo;category end effect&dquo; results in seven-point category scales being functionally reduced to five-point scales, five-point scales to three-point scales, etc.…”
Section: Psychophysical Scaling Of Comfortmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure SB shows the results of an interesting change in method introduced by Guilford and Dingman (18). They sought to get rid of the usual "end effects" observed with category scales by using a 15-point scale, but with the end stimuli (50 and 100 gm.)…”
Section: Lifted Weightsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The widest range (Cowdrick [7]) gives the usual category curve, concave downward, and we note that the middle weight in the series is assigned a value above the middle of the category scale. When the range is shortened (Guilford and Dingman [25]) the same general features are preserved. The shortest range is the one used by Fernberger (11) to determine a difference limen by the method of single stimuli.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%