A Modern Socio-Technical View on ERP-Systems

Benders, Jos; Batenburg, Ronald; Hoeken, Paul; Schouteten, R.L.J.

doi:10.4018/9781605662640.ch029

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Comparing Sociotechnical System Approach and Modern Sociotec1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…MST also differs from STS by its more integral approach (Benders et al, 2009). Whereas classic STS provides a set of static and partial design principles, MST offers more detailed structural principles in terms of design content, while at the same time specifying a theory of change by means of worker participation and training (Van Eijnatten, 1993).…”

Section: Comparing Sociotechnical System Approach and Modern Sociotecmentioning

confidence: 99%

Sociotechnical perspectives on digitalisation and Industry 4.0

Kopp

Dhondt

Hirsch‐Kreinsen

et al. 2019

IJTTC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The sociotechnical systems approach and theory (STS) helps to deal with today's rapid digital transformations in designing best suitable work, organisations and jobs. Not surprisingly, related approaches based on STS assumptions, such as modern sociotechnical thinking (MST) and workplace innovation (WPI) theory, are rapidly developing in Europe. Yet, research and (theoretical) analyses that place STS in today's digital industry challenges and WPI are sparse. The basics of sociotechnical concepts and new research, needs and perspectives for further development of STS in today's context need to be explored. Therefore, against the background of empirical experiences in

show abstract

Section: Comparing Sociotechnical System Approach and Modern Sociotecmentioning

confidence: 99%