2019
DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2019000868
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A modern reassessment of glycoprotein-specific direct platelet autoantibody testing in immune thrombocytopenia

Abstract: Key Points When performed in accordance with modern ASH and ISTH guidelines, PA testing is sensitive and specific for ITP diagnosis. More glycoproteins targeted by autoantibodies predicts for more severe disease, and autoantibodies resolve with clinical remission.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
64
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(60 reference statements)
7
64
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Antibody titers may be important indicators of disease; however, we were unable to reliably compare autoantibody titers between BM and PB because of nonstandardized dilutions and processing methods. Although other investigators have found that the sensitivity of PB platelet autoantibodies was higher than what we found, 19,20 many other studies are in line with our findings. 2 In addition, there was no association between autoantibody profiles of ITP patients and the treatments they received at the time of autoantibody testing (supplemental Tables 1 and 2).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Antibody titers may be important indicators of disease; however, we were unable to reliably compare autoantibody titers between BM and PB because of nonstandardized dilutions and processing methods. Although other investigators have found that the sensitivity of PB platelet autoantibodies was higher than what we found, 19,20 many other studies are in line with our findings. 2 In addition, there was no association between autoantibody profiles of ITP patients and the treatments they received at the time of autoantibody testing (supplemental Tables 1 and 2).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Unsurprisingly, anti-GPIIb/IIIa antibodies were the most frequently detected, either isolated (24.6%) or associated with anti-GPIb/IX (23.2%), which is consistent with previous studies (10.7-23.5% and 17.5-61.4%, respectively) [18][19][20][21][22][23]. However, the proportion of patients with isolated anti-GPIb/IX was particularly low in our study (1.4%), whereas these antibodies usually account for 3.1-13.3% [18][19][20][21][22][23]. The reason for such a discrepancy was not clear but could be due to a bias of selection as antiplatelet antibodies were not systematically and prospectively measured in our cohort, in accordance with the guidelines [12].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The proportion of patients without antiplatelet antibodies detected by MAIPA was similar to previous papers that reported a frequency around 50% [18][19][20][21], excepted for the last studies that did not detect antiplatelet antibodies in only 20% [22,23]. Unsurprisingly, anti-GPIIb/IIIa antibodies were the most frequently detected, either isolated (24.6%) or associated with anti-GPIb/IX (23.2%), which is consistent with previous studies (10.7-23.5% and 17.5-61.4%, respectively) [18][19][20][21][22][23]. However, the proportion of patients with isolated anti-GPIb/IX was particularly low in our study (1.4%), whereas these antibodies usually account for 3.1-13.3% [18][19][20][21][22][23].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…26,27 Studies, which require confirmation, suggest it may possibly be prognostic for treatment response in the future. 28,29 Anti-phospholipid antibodies. Anti-phospholipid antibodies (APLAs), including anti-cardiolipin antibodies and lupus anticoagulant, can be found in up to 46% of otherwise typical adults with ITP, 30 although most studies report rates of 25% to 30%.…”
Section: Tests Of Potential Utilitymentioning
confidence: 99%