2022
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abm2689
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A modern pulse of ultrafast exhumation and diachronous crustal melting in the Nanga Parbat Massif

Abstract: We combine monazite petrochronology with thermal modeling to evaluate the relative roles of crustal melting, surface denudation, and tectonics in facilitating ultrafast exhumation of the Nanga Parbat Massif in the western Himalayan syntaxis. Our results reveal diachronous melting histories between samples and a pulse of ultrafast exhumation (9 to 13 mm/year) that began ~1 Ma and was preceded by several million years of slower, but still rapid, exhumation (2 to 5 mm/year). Recent studies show that an exhumation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Nanga Parbat ‐ Haramosh syntaxial massif (NPHM) forms the core of the western Himalayan syntaxis, defined by a major change in the orogen strike (Butler, 2019). The syntaxial massif itself is characterized by Plio‐Pleistocene mineral crystallization and cooling ages, and sustained rapid (c. 10 mm/a) exhumation rates since the late Miocene, including small‐volume partial melting (Crowley et al., 2009; Guevara et al., 2022; Zeitler et al., 1993).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Nanga Parbat ‐ Haramosh syntaxial massif (NPHM) forms the core of the western Himalayan syntaxis, defined by a major change in the orogen strike (Butler, 2019). The syntaxial massif itself is characterized by Plio‐Pleistocene mineral crystallization and cooling ages, and sustained rapid (c. 10 mm/a) exhumation rates since the late Miocene, including small‐volume partial melting (Crowley et al., 2009; Guevara et al., 2022; Zeitler et al., 1993).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2020) shows that the exhumation rates increased significantly from 4 km/Myr at 8 Ma to 9 km/Myr at 2 Ma. Previous models attributed such increases of exhumation rate to strengthening of the driving forces either from tectonic or surface processes (Guevara et al., 2022; King et al., 2016; Yang et al., 2021). Similar to the tectonic aneurysm model (Koons et al., 2013; Zeitler et al., 2001, 2014), our erosion‐driven model confirms the coupling between surface erosion and rapid uplift of the EHS.…”
Section: Implications For the Eastern Himalayan Syntaxis Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Modified from Guevara et al. (2022). Dashed box shows the area of the Eastern Himalayan Syntaxis (EHS).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could be a main driving force accelerating eastward crustal ow 46 . The accelerated crustal ow at the Eastern Himalayan Syntaxis (EHS) drives the localized deformation and uplift [47][48][49] , leading to the active coupling between crustal rock advection and river erosion in the EHS 50 since ~ 7 Ma (Fig. 4b).…”
Section: Mechanisms For Impeding River Incision In the Late Miocenementioning
confidence: 99%