1982
DOI: 10.1029/rs017i005p00895
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A model to calculate em fields in tropospheric duct environments at frequencies through SHF

Abstract: Free‐space field levels are common in a tropospheric duct environment even at distances well beyond the horizon, when the frequency of propagation is above the minimum trapping frequency of the duct. Thus the likelihood of experiencing such a field enhancement is greater at higher propagation frequencies as long as molecular absorption does not become appreciable. A formulation of the wave‐guide duct problem is described which facilitates numerical solution without encountering the numerical difficulties for h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Refractive effects are included by varying the effective Earth radius, which corresponds to varying the constant gradient of refractivity that is assumed. The gradient given above corresponds to an effective Earth radius of (4/3)a e. Calculations are made using a waveguide mode propagation model [Marcus, 1982] as well as the parabolic equation method. The particular waveguide program used here was written at the Naval Ocean Systems Center and is described by Hithey et al [1985] and Baumgartner [1983].…”
Section: Comparisons Between Parabolic Equation/splitstep Results Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Refractive effects are included by varying the effective Earth radius, which corresponds to varying the constant gradient of refractivity that is assumed. The gradient given above corresponds to an effective Earth radius of (4/3)a e. Calculations are made using a waveguide mode propagation model [Marcus, 1982] as well as the parabolic equation method. The particular waveguide program used here was written at the Naval Ocean Systems Center and is described by Hithey et al [1985] and Baumgartner [1983].…”
Section: Comparisons Between Parabolic Equation/splitstep Results Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lsm is particularly significant for trapped modes in a surface duct. For propagation over smooth Earth these modes experience little or no attenuation in the propagation direction, which accounts for the field enhancement within the duct [Marcus and Stuart, 1981]. For trapped modes within a surface duct characterized by a bilinear refractivity profile [Marcus, 1987] Predictions of the field relative to free space, using the four lowest-order modes, are shown in Figure 4 for a 6.814-GHz radio wave propagating within the duct defined by the refractivity profile of Figure 1.…”
Section: A Methods For Considering Ground Roughness Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerical methods for predicting field strengths at large distances from a radiating source in surface and elevated ducts have been documented [Marcus, 1982;Marcus and Stuart, 1981]. These methods are based on the waveguide mode theory of wave propagation [Budden, 1961] and assume horizontal homogeneity, which implies a smooth Earth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This would be the case if a fine path loss mapping were required for a large portion of the environment, since the field at all the mesh points of the finite difference grid are determined directly as part of the implicit finite difference algorithm. The normal mode expansion, on the other hand, would generally require either (a) evaluation of determinants with highly transcendental elements at each field location (Marcus, 1982), or (b) extensive use of a mass storage device.…”
Section: "Imposed" Homogeneitymentioning
confidence: 99%