2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0950-0618(03)00041-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A model specification for FRP composites for civil engineering structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
64
1
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 170 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
64
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Also given are two measures of the fit of the data: the correlation coefficient of the Arrhenius plot (r 2 ) and the root-mean-square error of the individual model predictions with respect to the actual measured value of S at any given time, effectively the coefficient of variation (COV) of S. Perhaps the most striking aspect is the generally extremely high values of r 2 associated with the Arrhenius plots; always P0.95 and in most cases >0.99. Contrast this with the assertion by Bank [31] that any value over 0.8 is 'valid' (implying that many values Table 2 Model fit results for all data sets Designation ÀE k /kJ mol À1 (r 2 ), k 0 /day À1 (COV) ÀE d /kJ mol À1 (r 2 ), k 0 /day À1 , (COV) ÀE n /kJ mol À1 (r 2 ), k 0 /day À1 (COV) n Cross-ply E-glass/epoxy laminates VT1 120 derived using other modelling procedures are a good deal less robust). The error in predicting the mean value of S is also relatively low, $1-2% in most cases, indicating that the model is the 'right shape' (note that the typical COV for a single strength data point is >5% for most GRP data sets and >10% for most GRC data sets).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 66%
“…Also given are two measures of the fit of the data: the correlation coefficient of the Arrhenius plot (r 2 ) and the root-mean-square error of the individual model predictions with respect to the actual measured value of S at any given time, effectively the coefficient of variation (COV) of S. Perhaps the most striking aspect is the generally extremely high values of r 2 associated with the Arrhenius plots; always P0.95 and in most cases >0.99. Contrast this with the assertion by Bank [31] that any value over 0.8 is 'valid' (implying that many values Table 2 Model fit results for all data sets Designation ÀE k /kJ mol À1 (r 2 ), k 0 /day À1 (COV) ÀE d /kJ mol À1 (r 2 ), k 0 /day À1 , (COV) ÀE n /kJ mol À1 (r 2 ), k 0 /day À1 (COV) n Cross-ply E-glass/epoxy laminates VT1 120 derived using other modelling procedures are a good deal less robust). The error in predicting the mean value of S is also relatively low, $1-2% in most cases, indicating that the model is the 'right shape' (note that the typical COV for a single strength data point is >5% for most GRP data sets and >10% for most GRC data sets).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 66%
“…An Arrhenius related methodology [11] has been used to predict the long-term behaviour of three commercially available pultruded GFRP plates adopted as cladding in have been considered as measurement of the materials ageing and, by defining a performance related threshold, it has been possible to estimate the expected service life of the three materials composition. A comparison of the mechanical performance of the composites immersed in water, with data collected through natural ageing [12] has been also proposed to compare the magnitude of the imparted degrade in water with that in a semi-continental natural environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…is the same at the elevated aging temperature as at the mean service temperature, and that a single mechanism controls the degradation process throughout (BS EN ISO 2578Bank et al 2003).…”
Section: Long-term Durability and Accelerated Agingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These researchers used their study to conclude that the affect of temperature is the most important aging factor, with time and/or sustained loading of secondary importance. Bank et al (2003) outlines a material specification with Procedure B for the determination of long-term properties for material qualification. Their accelerated testing has the maximum aging temperature taken to be 0.8 of the (nominal) glass transition temperature (T g ) that can be based on data provided by Chateauminois et al (1995).…”
Section: Long-term Durability and Accelerated Agingmentioning
confidence: 99%