2011
DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Model Program for a Devastating Disease: Important Content and Methods Issues in Translating Research Into Practice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is important to note, however, that all but one study in this review (Döpp et al, 2011) used pre-post designs with no control group, which have inherent risk of bias. This pragmatic approach to evaluation is common in implementation research, due to the complexity of implementation issues (Glasgow, 2011), but future research with more rigorous designs may help confirm these findings.…”
Section: Clinical Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…It is important to note, however, that all but one study in this review (Döpp et al, 2011) used pre-post designs with no control group, which have inherent risk of bias. This pragmatic approach to evaluation is common in implementation research, due to the complexity of implementation issues (Glasgow, 2011), but future research with more rigorous designs may help confirm these findings.…”
Section: Clinical Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…For example, the VHA's Resources for Enhancing Alzheimer Caregivers' Health (REACH VA) program, originally based in Tennessee, offers in-home support to caregivers of veterans with dementia and has been effective in decreasing perceived caregiver burden (Glasgow, 2011;Nichols, Martindale-Adams, Burns, Graney, & Zuber, 2011;Widera & Covinsky, 2011). However, because the REACH VA program was specifically designed for caregivers of veterans with dementia, all the information, support, and services are targeted specifically to dementia caregivers (Nichols et al, 2011).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%