2017
DOI: 10.5028/jatm.v9i1.613
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Model Predictive Guidance Strategy for a Multirotor Aerial Vehicle

Abstract: The present study faces the problem of safely controlling the position trajectory of a multirotor aerial vehicle subjected to a conic constraint on the total thrust vector and a linear convex constraint on the position vector. The problem is solved using a linear state-space model predictive control strategy, whose optimization is made handy by replacing the original conic constraint set on the thrust vector by an inscribed pyramidal space, which renders a linear set of inequalities. The proposed method is eva… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both control laws provide virtual actuation variables that must be converted into commands to the real effectors of the vehicle via control allocation (Johansen and Fossen, 2013). There are a plenty of methods for designing attitude and position controllers for MAVs, using different control strategies such as saturated-PD controllers (Santos et al, 2013), model predictive controllers (Prado and Santos, 2017), and sliding model controllers (Silva and Santos, 2016), just to cite a few examples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both control laws provide virtual actuation variables that must be converted into commands to the real effectors of the vehicle via control allocation (Johansen and Fossen, 2013). There are a plenty of methods for designing attitude and position controllers for MAVs, using different control strategies such as saturated-PD controllers (Santos et al, 2013), model predictive controllers (Prado and Santos, 2017), and sliding model controllers (Silva and Santos, 2016), just to cite a few examples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%