2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.05.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A model of within person variation in leadership: Emotion regulation and scripts as predictors of situationally appropriate leadership

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 101 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, they argue that the simplicity and static nature of extant management theories implies that dynamic changes in the complexity and size of modern organizations are difficult to capture. 1 From a theoretical perspective, I agree that this simplicity and static nature can pose challenges, for instance, when we fail to better understand ever more dynamic and frequently changing organization–employee relationships (in neglected areas such as multiple jobholding, see Sliter and Boyd, 2014 ), or in terms of not fully understanding within-leader behavior variance in relation to situationally appropriate leadership ( Jordan and Lindebaum, in press ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, they argue that the simplicity and static nature of extant management theories implies that dynamic changes in the complexity and size of modern organizations are difficult to capture. 1 From a theoretical perspective, I agree that this simplicity and static nature can pose challenges, for instance, when we fail to better understand ever more dynamic and frequently changing organization–employee relationships (in neglected areas such as multiple jobholding, see Sliter and Boyd, 2014 ), or in terms of not fully understanding within-leader behavior variance in relation to situationally appropriate leadership ( Jordan and Lindebaum, in press ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Emotional control ability: Studies have shown that the most important factor affecting project progress is management skills, rather than construction technology issues [42]. In recent research, the emotion of project managers has been emphasized as the core factor influencing the manner in which leaders manage daily work [43]. The Mayer-Salovey-Caruso emotional intelligence test (MSCEIT) measures the managing emotions in two branches: emotional and social management [44].…”
Section: Competencies Of the Project Manager In Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of anger in a negative way creates an atmosphere in which our theorizing around anger is increasingly uni-dimensional (see e.g. Berkowitz, 1994 ; Jordan and Lindebaum, in press) , and predominately linked with undesirable outcomes at work. Indeed, anger in leadership studies has been linked to perceptions of un-inspirational leadership ( Waldman et al, 2011 ), petty leader tyranny ( Kant et al, 2013 ) or observer perceptions of reduced leader effectiveness ( Lewis, 2000 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%