A Model of Trade and Growth with a Non-Traded Service Sector

Xu, Yini

doi:10.2307/135831

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The degree of labour intensity in a given sector can also affect inter‐firm learning. For example, service‐sector industries are more labour intensive than industries in the primary or the secondary sectors (Xu, 1993); therefore, they might be more prone to organizational learning. Thus we have the following hypothesis:…”

Section: Theoretical Background and Hypothesesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cross‐border Inter‐firm Networks in the European Union's Eastern Neighbourhood: Integration via Organizational Learning*

Turkina

Postnikov

2012

J of Common Market Studies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The European Union (EU) is seeking to generate stronger integration in the wider Europe without further enlargement by involving its immediate neighbours in various regional partnerships. What are the effects of such co‐operation across the eastern borders of the EU and what are the prospects for bringing this region's countries closer to the EU without offering them the possibility of formal EU membership? Using the tools of social network analysis and regression methods, this article investigates the effect of the EU's external governance on the previously neglected societal level by focusing on cross‐border inter‐firm networks. The findings show that the diffusion of organizational practices is occurring within these networks which have emerged as the result of EU governance efforts abroad. The article explores the causal mechanisms of this diffusion, and also identifies factors that impede or catalyze the transfer of organizational practices. It also points to the relevance of neofunctionalism in explaining integration between the EU and its eastern neighbours.

show abstract

Section: Theoretical Background and Hypothesesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cross‐border Inter‐firm Networks in the European Union's Eastern Neighbourhood: Integration via Organizational Learning*

Turkina

Postnikov

2012

J of Common Market Studies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Xu (1993), Echevarria (1997), Kongsamut et al (2001), Buera and Kaboski (2006) and Ngai and Pissarides (2007) assume exogenous technical progress, at the same or differing rates across sectors, while Stokey (1988) allows for learning-by-doing in one sector (manufacturing) but not in another (agriculture). Meckl (2002), Klenow (1996), and Acemoglu and Guerrieri (2006) adopt the EPV framework of RGH, as we do: RGH assume a single final-goods sector, whereas these models are multisectoral.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Progressive services, asymptotically stagnant services, and manufacturing: Growth and structural change

Kapur¹

2012

Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A Model of Trade and Growth with a Non-Traded Service Sector

Cited by 2 publications

References 3 publications

Cross‐border Inter‐firm Networks in the European Union's Eastern Neighbourhood: Integration via Organizational Learning*

Cross‐border Inter‐firm Networks in the European Union's Eastern Neighbourhood: Integration via Organizational Learning*

Progressive services, asymptotically stagnant services, and manufacturing: Growth and structural change

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About