2008
DOI: 10.2753/pke0160-3477300303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A model of the Spanish housing market

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
12
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The effect of real disposable income in the case of Spain is higher in our contribution in comparison with the one estimated by Esteban and Altuzarra (), although both have identical signs (3.544 and 0.851, respectively).…”
contrasting
confidence: 57%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The effect of real disposable income in the case of Spain is higher in our contribution in comparison with the one estimated by Esteban and Altuzarra (), although both have identical signs (3.544 and 0.851, respectively).…”
contrasting
confidence: 57%
“…The parameter, which the Spanish model displays, is higher than the one estimated by Esteban and Altuzarra (), i.e., 0.7174 versus 1.634.…”
contrasting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…13 However Esteban and Altuzarra (2008) do not find such a speculative component in the housing prices in Spain: "the Spanish housing boom seems not to be an artificial bubble created by ...speculation", (p.371). In line with the theoretical discussion the natural way to test for FREI acquisition costs is the direct inclusion of the current housing prices (HP) with an expected negative sign.…”
Section: The Empirical Specificationmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The earlier econometric analyses included Nellis and Longbottom (1981), which looked at residential property prices in the UK during the 1960-70s, and Case and Shiller (1990), which investigated house price dynamics in four US cities using quarterly data covering 1970-1986. More recently, the determinants of residential house prices were examined in various individual economies: the UK (Xu & Tang, 2014), Spain (Esteban & Altuzarra, 2008;Gimeno & Martinez-Carrascal, 2010), Hong Kong (Chow & Shih, 1995;Tse et al, 1999;Leung et al, 2008), Taiwan (Chen et al, 2007;Tsai & Peng, 2011), Singapore (Lum, 2002), China (Liu & Shen, 2005;Wang & Zhang, 2013;Guo & Wu, 2013), and Iran (Pour et al, 2013). Major comparative studies included Greiber and Setzer (2007), who examined European economies and the US in the periods of 1981-2006and 1986-2006as well as Hofmann (2003), who considered 20 developed economies in Europe, America, and Asia.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%