1992
DOI: 10.1037/0278-6133.11.3.170
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A model of the precaution adoption process: Evidence from home radon testing.

Abstract: We present the precaution adoption process model-a stage theory consisting of seven distinct states between ignorance and completed preventive action. The stages are "unaware of the issue," "aware of the issue but not personally engaged," "engaged and deciding what to do," "planning to act but not yet having acted," "having decided not to act," "acting," and "maintenance." The theory asserts that these stages represent qualitatively different patterns of behavior, beliefs, and experience and that the factors t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
284
1
3

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 361 publications
(298 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
6
284
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Prominent theories of health behavior change defend that first individuals need to become motivated to change their health behaviors and only after they need to acquire the right skills to implement the intended changes (Schwarzer, 2008;Weinstein & Sandman, 1992), but virtually no prior studies have directly tested this assumption. In the present study, two different interventions providing the same contents (i.e., motivational and self-regulatory), but in two different sequences (Sequence 1: first motivational followed by self-regulatory versus Sequence 2: self-regulatory followed by motivational) were compared in terms of their efficacy on the promotion of FV intake.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prominent theories of health behavior change defend that first individuals need to become motivated to change their health behaviors and only after they need to acquire the right skills to implement the intended changes (Schwarzer, 2008;Weinstein & Sandman, 1992), but virtually no prior studies have directly tested this assumption. In the present study, two different interventions providing the same contents (i.e., motivational and self-regulatory), but in two different sequences (Sequence 1: first motivational followed by self-regulatory versus Sequence 2: self-regulatory followed by motivational) were compared in terms of their efficacy on the promotion of FV intake.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although incorporation of relevant theories into applications does not necessarily guarantee the success of applications in inducing changes of behaviour, there is a strong likelihood that such a system would likely be more capable in achieving this through design. For instance, in Mobile Snack, Khan et al [63] incorporated the Transportation Theories [112,13] and Precaution Adoption Process Model [114] by providing an immersive animation-based narrative that depicted the game characters' progressive life stages based on their eating behaviour. They also applied Social Cognitive Theory [115] by allowing users to view their eating behaviour history and compare themselves with other users.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, evidence suggests that it is important to ensure that individuals are motivated before they are provided with volitional strategies and techniques (e.g. planning) to promote the translation of this motivation into health behaviour change (Schwarzer, 2008;Sheeran, Webb, & Gollwitzer, 2005;Weinstein & Sandman, 1992). With this in mind, the present intervention drew on the HAPA to identify the putative determinants of motivation (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%