2010
DOI: 10.3378/027.082.0104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Model of the Mechanisms of Language Extinction and Revitalization Strategies to Save Endangered Languages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
29
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our model is rather simple in the sense that the roles of large cities, education policies, mass media, etc. [11,24] are not explicitly included. For these reasons, we would like to stress our results should be 11…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our model is rather simple in the sense that the roles of large cities, education policies, mass media, etc. [11,24] are not explicitly included. For these reasons, we would like to stress our results should be 11…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It could be also generalized to take into account the e¤ects of large cities, mobility networks, policies directed to avoid the extinction of endangered languages, etc. [11,24]. For a given example of language replacement, our model can be also applied to speci…c regions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A greater effort to model language planning was undertaken in Fernando et al (2010). They consider intergenerational language transmission as well as horizontal transmission.…”
Section: Language Competition Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The three states are: the fraction of speakers of language A (denoted by p A ), the fraction of speakers of language B (denoted by p B ) and the relative status of language B (denoted by S). The fraction of bilingual speakers is simply given by p C = 1 − p A − p B , and the relative status of the majority language A is given by 1 − S. In Fernando et al (2010) the authors criticize such an assumption in the model of Minett and Wang because it implies ''that it is impossible to make one language more attractive without making the other less so'' (Minett and Wang, 2008, p. 50). However, in a language competition situation, where individuals have to decide for one language, the other or both, this assumption makes sense when we think of relative attractiveness instead of absolute attractiveness.…”
Section: Language Competition Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model [5] of the mechanisms of language extinction and revitalization strategies to save endangered languages is a mechanistic model characterized by parameters that can be measured. Also, bilingualism has been incorporated into the model, so as to mainly focus on the functions of the child's family type and speaker frequency rather than describing the child's language type, monolingual or bilingual.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%