Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces - IUI '03 2003
DOI: 10.1145/604050.604067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A model of textual affect sensing using real-world knowledge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
105
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
105
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Several research groups have endeavored to extract emotional content from text automatically (Liu et al 2003, Lu et al 2006). Our approach is to construct an affect lexicon starting from seed lists and expanding the lexicon using the PageRank algorithm on graph structures defined by WordNet and other sources.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Several research groups have endeavored to extract emotional content from text automatically (Liu et al 2003, Lu et al 2006). Our approach is to construct an affect lexicon starting from seed lists and expanding the lexicon using the PageRank algorithm on graph structures defined by WordNet and other sources.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LIWC performs keyword spotting of affective processes that includes positive emotions in addition to negative emotions such as anxiety, anger, and sadness. Some investigators have specifically attempted to identify affect in text (Liu et al 2003, Al Masum et al 2007, Alm et al 2005, Aman and Szpakowicz 2008, Abbasi et al 2008) using either an affect lexicon or supervised learning techniques. These efforts have mostly been directed at document-level assessment of affect.…”
Section: Sentiment Analysis and Affective Sensingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Dave et al [12] categorized positive versus negative movie reviews using support vector machines on various types of semantic features based on substitutions and proximity, and achieved an accuracy of at most 88.9% on data from Amazon and Cnn.Net. Liu et al [13] proposed a framework to categorize emotions based on a large dictionary of common sense knowledge and on linguistic models.…”
Section: Related Work On Sentimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%