2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10648-020-09575-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Model of Technology Incidental Learning Effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 127 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Defining a successful outcome largely depends on which standards define achievement: personal (e.g., being content with a personal decision; relieving anxiety) or normative (e.g., achieving full understanding of a concept in alignment with the current scientific state of knowledge). We are aware that these aims require very different cognitive and motivational processes; consequently, we focus on engagement that is moderated by individuals' epistemic aims and we review research to find out which reliable processes are beneficial for achieving such aims, and for dealing with context constraints and affordances in the process [in contrast, Greene et al (2020) recently focused on incidental learning in online environments]. Thus, the purpose of this article is to review the literature in several related fields in educational science and educational psychology to identify aspects of the context, and of individual's cognitive and motivational prerequisites that are especially beneficial or detrimental to effortful and productive OESI.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Defining a successful outcome largely depends on which standards define achievement: personal (e.g., being content with a personal decision; relieving anxiety) or normative (e.g., achieving full understanding of a concept in alignment with the current scientific state of knowledge). We are aware that these aims require very different cognitive and motivational processes; consequently, we focus on engagement that is moderated by individuals' epistemic aims and we review research to find out which reliable processes are beneficial for achieving such aims, and for dealing with context constraints and affordances in the process [in contrast, Greene et al (2020) recently focused on incidental learning in online environments]. Thus, the purpose of this article is to review the literature in several related fields in educational science and educational psychology to identify aspects of the context, and of individual's cognitive and motivational prerequisites that are especially beneficial or detrimental to effortful and productive OESI.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Technol. 2022; 54: 256-259 have influenced their understanding of the purpose of the lights and provided limited opportunities to witness adaptation in behaviours or incidental learning effects 33 from longer exposure to the new lighting technologies.…”
Section: First Results From the Field Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the study was carried out over a short period of time, very soon after the fitting and first operation of the lighting, when many passengers were experiencing the lights for the first time. This may have influenced their understanding of the purpose of the lights and provided limited opportunities to witness adaptation in behaviours or incidental learning effects 33 from longer exposure to the new lighting technologies.…”
Section: Challenges For Field-based Lighting Studies In This Type Of Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rooted in individuals’ innate cognitive bias, “motivated reasoning” addresses that people prefer information that is consistent with their prior beliefs, which might restrain the effect of science communication and interpersonal information discussion (Druckman & McGrath, 2019). Intrinsic value is one of the most important restrictive factors that limits the extent to which individuals respond to information (Greene et al, 2021; Yadamsuren & Erdelez, 2016). Indeed, citizens with strong pro-environmental values are less swayed by media information that denies climate change (Corbett & Durfee, 2004), and they are more likely to possess higher degrees of personal responsibility to take mitigating actions in response to environmental threats (Bouman et al, 2020).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, in the incidental information exposure context, noticing or initial attention is a crucial prerequisite for information acquisition (Heinström, 2006). However, if information is not perceived as consistent with the person’s beliefs or values, it is less likely to lead to further engagement (Greene et al, 2021; Yadamsuren & Erdelez, 2016), and thereby less likely to lead to further cognitive processing and subsequent attitude change. In this sense, a less active information engagement process (such as encountering information online or incidentally getting involved in a discussion) might not attract the attention of people with weaker pro-environmental values.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%