1998
DOI: 10.1080/10811689809368662
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A model of public support for First Amendment rights

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Bird (1997), however, found no significant gender differences in willingness to censor hate speech, while D. M. McLeod, Eveland, and Nathanson (1997) detected no differences in endorsement of censorship of violent and misogynic rap lyrics. And for more generalized expressive rights, Andsanger andMiller (1994) andJ. M. McLeod, Sotirovic, Voakes, Guo, andHuang (1998) reported no differences between men and women in mean levels of support.…”
Section: Gendermentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Bird (1997), however, found no significant gender differences in willingness to censor hate speech, while D. M. McLeod, Eveland, and Nathanson (1997) detected no differences in endorsement of censorship of violent and misogynic rap lyrics. And for more generalized expressive rights, Andsanger andMiller (1994) andJ. M. McLeod, Sotirovic, Voakes, Guo, andHuang (1998) reported no differences between men and women in mean levels of support.…”
Section: Gendermentioning
confidence: 94%
“…And for more generalized expressive rights, Andsanger andMiller (1994) andJ. M. McLeod, Sotirovic, Voakes, Guo, andHuang (1998) reported no differences between men and women in mean levels of support.…”
Section: Gendermentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Those who have more education should, presumably, be more aware of the bases for free speech and how restrictions upon that right would set precedents for further encroachment of individual rights. Cognitive variables are strongly, and positively related to support for freedom of expression (Andsager, 1993;Bob0 & Licari, 1989;McLeod, Sotirovic, Guo, & Huang, 1997).…”
Section: Speech and Free Pressmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Any evidence for selectivity in media is credited as a reinforcement effect. Published research reveals large discrepancies between conceptual and operational definitions: for example, cognitive complexity as measured by number of words used by the subject and principled reasoning as measured by cross-issue consistency-an operational definition previously used as an indicator of "ideology" (Converse, 1964)-rather than measured more directly from open-ended respondent protocols (McLeod, Sotirovic, Voakes, Guo, & Huang, 1998).…”
Section: Recurrent Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%