2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2014.05.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A model of human nasal epithelial cells adapted for direct and repeated exposure to airborne pollutants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We hypothesized that after 3 days of exposure we could observe regulation of genes that support adaptation and/or defense against formaldehyde-mediated insults, while other studies using comparable concentrations but shorter exposure times were not able to detect cellular responses. Low environmental concentrations of approximately 0.04 ppm formaldehyde applied for 30 minutes did not increase the production of inflammation markers chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 2 (CCL2) and interleukin 8 (IL8) in A549 and BEAS-2B without any additional sensitization42 and also in another study, exposure to 0.2 ppm formaldehyde for 1 hour had no effect on IL-8 in A549 cells20. In a repeated exposure experiment of up to three exposures of epithelial cells of nasal origin for 1 hour to concentrations of approximately 0.17 ppm formaldehyde in 24 h intervals, no impact of treatment on cell viability and unchanged levels of IL-6 was reported by Bardet et al ., and only after the third treatment IL-8 levels were reduced compared to air exposed control cells43.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…We hypothesized that after 3 days of exposure we could observe regulation of genes that support adaptation and/or defense against formaldehyde-mediated insults, while other studies using comparable concentrations but shorter exposure times were not able to detect cellular responses. Low environmental concentrations of approximately 0.04 ppm formaldehyde applied for 30 minutes did not increase the production of inflammation markers chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 2 (CCL2) and interleukin 8 (IL8) in A549 and BEAS-2B without any additional sensitization42 and also in another study, exposure to 0.2 ppm formaldehyde for 1 hour had no effect on IL-8 in A549 cells20. In a repeated exposure experiment of up to three exposures of epithelial cells of nasal origin for 1 hour to concentrations of approximately 0.17 ppm formaldehyde in 24 h intervals, no impact of treatment on cell viability and unchanged levels of IL-6 was reported by Bardet et al ., and only after the third treatment IL-8 levels were reduced compared to air exposed control cells43.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In vivo experiments have been designed to investigate the production of cytokines after FA exposure [ 13 , 19 , 35 , 36 ] because in vivo experiments are satisfactory simulations of real FA exposure situations. Recently, a few in vitro studies [ 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 ] have successfully created FA exposure conditions in specific cellular models at the air-liquid interface. However, different cell lines respond differently to FA exposure when sensitized with a macrophage secretion medium.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Ohtsuka et al showed an adverse result, as follows: both the mRNAs of Th1-related cytokines (IFN-γ and IL-2) and Th2-related cytokines (IL-4 and IL-5) showed the tendency to be depressed in BN and F344 rats after inhaling 1% FA aerosol for 5 d [ 13 ]. Moreover, the production of cytokines after FA exposure was investigated in in vitro studies besides in vivo studies [ 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 ]. On average, a 16.9-fold increase of the inflammatory response protein IL-8 was observed in human lung epithelial cells after exposure to FA at 1 ppm for 4 h [ 24 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To quantify the oxidative potential of airborne particulate matter, both in-vivo and in-vitro studies have been conducted. These studies have found correlations between the oxidative potential of airborne particles and the production of biological markers of ROS formation and oxidative stress (Bardet et al, 2014;Hawley et al, 2014;Li et al, 2004;Swanson et al, 2009;Acworth et al, 1999;Kim et al, 2001;Maier et al, 2008;Oberdorster, 2000). Yet the extent of these measurements is limited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%