Abstract:Housing programs are complex social interventions. Research on housing for people with mental illness has proceeded without a framework for integrating emerging findings and guiding new research directions. This paper describes a definition and model of housing stability developed with stakeholders in 3 local housing systems for people with mental illness. The model describes housing stability as a dynamic relationship among 3 factors (person, housing, and support) that are influenced by broader system influen… Show more
“…We found that traditional definitions of housing stability that view material aspects of stability as the primary indicator of housing stability are insufficient to describe the experiences of these women. Similar to Sylvestre et al’s ( 2009 ) findings, our research suggests that definitions of housing stability must be broad enough to incorporate women’s lived experiences as well as their ability to be independent and exercise personal choice. Specifically, we found that for women who have left violent households, safety, security, family friendly housing, and comfort are embedded in their definitions of a stable home.…”
There is evidence that involuntary housing instability may undermine health and well-being. For women who have experienced intimate partner violence (IPV), achieving stability is likely as important for other groups, but can be challenging. Through our analysis of 41 interviews with women who have experienced low income and IPV, we argue that definitions of housing stability are multifaceted and for many centred on a shared understanding of the importance of creating an environment of “home”. We found that obtaining housing that satisfied material needs was important to women. However, in asking women to define what housing stability meant to them, we found that other factors related to ontological security and the home, such as safety, community, and comfort, contributed to women’s experiences of stability. Through our discussion of the importance these women placed on establishing stable homes, we argue that future research on women’s experiences with housing stability and IPV should include definitions of stability that capture both material security and women’s experiences with building emotionally stable homes.
“…We found that traditional definitions of housing stability that view material aspects of stability as the primary indicator of housing stability are insufficient to describe the experiences of these women. Similar to Sylvestre et al’s ( 2009 ) findings, our research suggests that definitions of housing stability must be broad enough to incorporate women’s lived experiences as well as their ability to be independent and exercise personal choice. Specifically, we found that for women who have left violent households, safety, security, family friendly housing, and comfort are embedded in their definitions of a stable home.…”
There is evidence that involuntary housing instability may undermine health and well-being. For women who have experienced intimate partner violence (IPV), achieving stability is likely as important for other groups, but can be challenging. Through our analysis of 41 interviews with women who have experienced low income and IPV, we argue that definitions of housing stability are multifaceted and for many centred on a shared understanding of the importance of creating an environment of “home”. We found that obtaining housing that satisfied material needs was important to women. However, in asking women to define what housing stability meant to them, we found that other factors related to ontological security and the home, such as safety, community, and comfort, contributed to women’s experiences of stability. Through our discussion of the importance these women placed on establishing stable homes, we argue that future research on women’s experiences with housing stability and IPV should include definitions of stability that capture both material security and women’s experiences with building emotionally stable homes.
“…The implicit understanding in the literature on housing stability is that it is the antithesis of homelessness and exists on a continuum (Aubry, Klodawsky, & Coulombe, ). However, as some researchers have pointed out (Brown, Ridgway, Anthony, & Rogers, ; Sylvestre, Ollenberg, & Trainor, ; Tsemberis, McHugo, Williams, Hanrahan, & Stefancic, ), definitions of homelessness and housing stability are not applied uniformly across studies, and therefore the methods used to measure these constructs differ as well. A more serious concern is that some studies in which the concept of housing stability figures prominently never actually define the term (Greene, Chambers, Masinde, & O'Brien‐Teengs, ).…”
Section: Measures and Predictors Of Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Work that examines the perspectives of service providers and consumers has highlighted that a house alone does not constitute housing stability and that it is not simply a question of tenure (Jakubec, Tomaszewski, Powell, & Osuji, 2012). This research emphasizes support structures that ease the transition into a mainstream life, and these supports can be seen as acting to reinforce the "housing" side of stability (see also Brueckner, Green, & Saggers, 2011;Dornbusch, 1994;Lindsey, 1995;Nemiroff, Aubry, & Klodawsky, 2010;Sylvestre et al, 2009).…”
Despite housing stability being a key concept in housing and homelessness policy, research, and service provision, it remains poorly defined and conceptualized, and to date there are no standard measures. We use in‐depth qualitative interviews with 51 young people transitioning away homelessness over the course of a year to examine the core dimensions of housing stability. Due to the potential for sudden change, we define housing stability as the extent to which an individual's customary access to housing of reasonable quality is secure. We define housing security among 8 main dimensions: housing type, recent housing history, current housing tenure, financial status, standing in the legal system, education and employment status, harmful substance use, and subjective assessments of housing satisfaction and stability. Based on these dimensions, we suggest a brief 13‐question scale that measures housing security.
“…Given the ambiguity surrounding the term housing stability, Sylvestre and colleagues worked to provide a nuanced understanding of what it means (Sylvestre, Ollenberg, & Trainor, 2009). In this report, we define housing stability as going beyond solely maintaining stable housing to include access to opportunities for wellbeing (such as health professionals and recreation centres) and information (such as schools, libraries and drop-in centres).…”
Unique among housing initiatives, Housing First operates on the principle that every person has the right to a safe and secure home regardless of housing readiness. The Housing First Support Program, operated by Homeward Trust Edmonton, is currently providing over 2,500 Edmontonians with secure housing and the supports needed in the transition from homelessness into housing. The program is intended to last 12 months, gradually reducing a client’s support untilthey are self-sufficient; however, this may be difficult for some clients, especially if they experience poor accessibility to the services and amenities they require to achieve housing stability. In particular, youth experiencing homelessness require supports that are tailored to their needs and that aid in the transition from adolescence to adulthood. As youth make up 17% (n=312) of Housing First clients, it is imperative that the services, centres, and supports necessary to breaking the cycle of homelessness are accessible to them at this critical stage in development. With this project, we mapped the locations of current Housing First clients aged 12-24 in relation to the services and amenities they may require to achieve housing stability. After identifying these services and amenities, we used a gravity model to create an Accessibility Index. This Accessibility Index highlights the service accessibility of current Housing First clients, and can be used in the future to identify areas of need and opportunities for increasing accessibility.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.