2002
DOI: 10.1002/smr.271
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A model of factors affecting an information system's change in state

Abstract: SUMMARYThis paper utilizes a theoretically-grounded model of information systems change together with data from 1891 maintenance projects to test the effects that four factors have on the volatility index of application software. The volatility index is a measure of the relative cost of doing maintenance on the deep structure of a system. Two factors were found to be associated with a higher volatility index, the age of the system and the size of the system. One factor was found to be associated with a lower v… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This answer may vary from company to company. Heales [13,34] remarks that there is a threshold x for each system such that when the system volatility index exceeds x the system changes states. The literature suggests that enhancement changes contribute to the high cost of software maintenance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This answer may vary from company to company. Heales [13,34] remarks that there is a threshold x for each system such that when the system volatility index exceeds x the system changes states. The literature suggests that enhancement changes contribute to the high cost of software maintenance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Putting these two pieces together, one could critique the fact that the model currently 'stops' at organizational impact, and propose instead that a successful IS is not only reflected in its impact at a point in time, but also in an organization's commitment to rectifying negative impacts, for example, by engaging in adaptive or corrective maintenance (Heales, 2002;Clark et al, 2007). This would correspond with the view that performance outcomes 'are just way-stations in ongoing processes … [and] interpretations of performance can have important effects on subsequent actions' (Langley & Abdallah, 2011, p. 211).…”
Section: Individual Usermentioning
confidence: 97%
“…• Second, note that one way to extend the three-stage model of creation→ use → consequences would be to recognize that systems are not just created once and for all, but maintained over time (Heales, 2002).…”
Section: Individual Usermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A popular measure, called software volatility, measures the number of enhancements per unit of time over a specified time frame [8]. High volatility is often associated to high maintenance costs; according to this point of view, when the volatility exceeds some threshold it may be more economical to rewrite the entire system from scratch instead of maintaining an aged (and unstable) software system [9,10]. We show here however that the probability distribution of scaled waiting times of the software projects converges towards a universal function, providing a contrario a measure of software maturity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%