1982
DOI: 10.1080/00140138208925049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A model of driver behaviour

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Increasingly, behaviour measures and psychophysiological activation parameters are employed as evaluation criteria for the planning and reconstruction of rural roads (Durth et al 1995). Until now, psychological assessment approaches have concentrated on the cognitive representation of road types (Fleury andDubois 1991 , Theeuwes andDiks 1995), on the typology of driving tasks (for an overview see M ichon 1985 , Ranny 1994), on driver behaviour assessment (Kramer and Rohr 1982, Bristow et al 1982, Glendon et al 1993 ) and on psychophysiological activation measures during driving (de W ard 1996). The objective of more recent approaches is to minimize the probability of human errors in driving by a safety-optimization of the driver± road-vehicle system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increasingly, behaviour measures and psychophysiological activation parameters are employed as evaluation criteria for the planning and reconstruction of rural roads (Durth et al 1995). Until now, psychological assessment approaches have concentrated on the cognitive representation of road types (Fleury andDubois 1991 , Theeuwes andDiks 1995), on the typology of driving tasks (for an overview see M ichon 1985 , Ranny 1994), on driver behaviour assessment (Kramer and Rohr 1982, Bristow et al 1982, Glendon et al 1993 ) and on psychophysiological activation measures during driving (de W ard 1996). The objective of more recent approaches is to minimize the probability of human errors in driving by a safety-optimization of the driver± road-vehicle system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Driving is widely accepted as being a predominantly visual task (Kramer and Rohr, 1982;Spence and Ho, 2009), yet it is necessary to share this resource between the forward view of the road and other visual distractors. Whilst it has been suggested that drivers might have up to 50% spare attentional capacity when driving (Hughes and Cole, 1986), visual competition in driving is already high, and is a crucial factor in driving performance (e.g., Antin, 1993).…”
Section: In-vehicle Information Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is considerable evidence that haptic interfaces impose significantly fewer demands than visual or auditory displays -and, indeed, that haptic information can to some extent be automatically processed (Gustafson-Pearce, 2007;Sklar and Sarter, 1999;Van Erp and Van Veen, 2004). Moreover, since driving is a predominantly visual task (Kramer and Rohr, 1982), the haptic processing channel offers a largely untapped resource in the driving environment, and could be used to provide information without overloading the other attentional resource pools used in driving (cf. Wickens, 2002).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The commonly cited multiple resource model for human information processing (Wickens, 2002) suggests that performance degradation is limited when complementary independent sensory resources are used to present information. Since driving is a predominantly visual task (Kramer and Rohr, 1982), using these other sensory modalities may reduce overload to the visual channel, leaving an increased capacity for visual driving tasks and theoretically improving performance. Van Erp (2001) has suggested that overload may be avoided by presenting feedback in either an auditory or haptic form, thereby not competing for the driver's visual resource pool.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%