1992
DOI: 10.1016/0022-0728(92)80214-o
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A model for the coadsorption of ions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…eq 6.16a). Following refs and , we take Δ s as 1.0 eV. For the chemisorption at the M−V interface, only one self-consistent value of 〈 n s σ 〉 equal to 0.49 is obtained.…”
Section: Numerical Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…eq 6.16a). Following refs and , we take Δ s as 1.0 eV. For the chemisorption at the M−V interface, only one self-consistent value of 〈 n s σ 〉 equal to 0.49 is obtained.…”
Section: Numerical Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…eqs 4.3 and 4.4): The last integral in the above expression diverges, and its lower limit needs a cutoff for obtaining a finite result. This energy cutoff is put at ε Γ , the bottom of conduction band in the metal …”
Section: Electrochemisorption: a Simple Model For Numerical Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Since this time, great progress has been made in this area. The Monte Carlo (MC) method as well as Molecular Dynamics (MD) have been successfully used in the last decade for the investigation of the properties of the metal-water [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] and the metal-ionic solution interface [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31]. A strategy commonly used for the description of interactions between all species involved in the simulated process, is to model them by some simple analytical functions derived from the results of quantum calculations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%