Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2013
DOI: 10.1785/0120130030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Model for Single-Station Standard Deviation Using Data from Various Tectonic Regions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

8
88
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
8
88
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Average within-event (considering scenarios as distinct events) standard deviations of simulated PGA and PGV are 44% and 32% (in natural log units) for the Lima metropolitan region. These values are consistent with event-corrected single-station standard deviations of observed data from various tectonic regions around the world (Rodriguez-Marek et al, 2013). It is also important to check nonlinearity effects of soils in simulated ground motions.…”
Section: Strong-motion Simulations In Lima Includingsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Average within-event (considering scenarios as distinct events) standard deviations of simulated PGA and PGV are 44% and 32% (in natural log units) for the Lima metropolitan region. These values are consistent with event-corrected single-station standard deviations of observed data from various tectonic regions around the world (Rodriguez-Marek et al, 2013). It is also important to check nonlinearity effects of soils in simulated ground motions.…”
Section: Strong-motion Simulations In Lima Includingsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Such analysis is motivated by the fact that the random variability associated to groundmotion predictions (sigma) strongly influences the seismichazard curve computation, in particular for long return periods (Bommer and Abrahamson, 2006). The understanding of the physical causes of ground-motion variability has not been explored yet, and topography is one of the suggested explanations (e.g., Rai et al, 2012;Rodriguez-Marek et al, 2013). Our simulations provide a unique opportunity to analyze the spatial variations of the ground-motion variability and discuss topography proxies that may help to identify sites where ground motions are more variable and highly dependent on source-site configurations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A very recent work by Rodriguez-Marek et al (2013) addresses the issue of the variation of single station sigma with respect to region, magnitude, and distance. First, it is remarkable from their work that the mean values of ϕ SS appear to be stable (average ϕ SS ≈ 0:45) across the different regions (California, Taiwan, Japan, Switzerland, and Turkey).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%