1967
DOI: 10.3733/hilg.v38n04p181
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A model for simulating photosynthesis in plant communities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
190
0
9

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 389 publications
(205 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
190
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Minimum values of specific leaf mass were observed at moderated depth in the haulm, which agrees with Gutschick & Wiegel (1988). Increased absorption of photosynthetically active radiation at high depth in the haulm (due to reduced leaf shading and leaf-angle distribution, with more erected leaves at the top and more horizontal leaves toward the bottom) increases light penetration (Duncan et al, 1967) and helps explain such variation in specific leaf mass for different leaf number and treatment.…”
Section: Leaf Growth and Partitioningsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Minimum values of specific leaf mass were observed at moderated depth in the haulm, which agrees with Gutschick & Wiegel (1988). Increased absorption of photosynthetically active radiation at high depth in the haulm (due to reduced leaf shading and leaf-angle distribution, with more erected leaves at the top and more horizontal leaves toward the bottom) increases light penetration (Duncan et al, 1967) and helps explain such variation in specific leaf mass for different leaf number and treatment.…”
Section: Leaf Growth and Partitioningsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…As such, modelling should become an important resource-saving tool to guide the choice of breeding and agronomic management investment. Crop models have simulated the effect of crop management and climate on yield (Duncan et al, 1967;de Wit et al, 1970;de Wit, 1978;Kumar et al, 2009;Kim et al, 2010). Later, crop models were redesigned into farming systems models that could consider more broadly the effects of the management system including the carryover effects of rotations, planting density and intercropping.…”
Section: Crop Growth Simulation and Modelling Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the nonlinear response of leaf carbon assimilation to light interception can create appreciable bias when scaling up canopy carbon assimilation using the big-leaf approach. To avoid the bias with the big-leaf scaling up scheme, multilayer models were developed where the plant canopy was divided into a number of parallel horizontal layers [Duncan et al, 1967;Baldocchi, 1993;Raupach and Finnigan, 1988]. More recent multilayer models consider the transfer of momentum, heat, water vapor, and CO 2 between the biosphere and the atmosphere and resolve all the way-way interactions between leaves and their immediate microclimate using higher order turbulent transport theories [Juang et al, 2008].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%