2002
DOI: 10.1088/0953-8984/15/2/314
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A model for many-body interaction effects in open quantum dot systems

Abstract: We discuss the influence of the electron–electron interaction on transport properties of open quantum dot systems. Based on the idea of the Anderson model, we present interaction-induced temperature-dependent corrections to the conductance beyond the single-particle picture.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The suggestion of the experimental studies in section 4.2.1 is that the additional, logarithmic, term in the resistance arises from confinement-enhanced of the electron-electron interaction [38]. For this reason, we have formulated [40,102] a manybody description of transport in open dots that is based on the idea of the Anderson system, in which a single impurity level with an on-site electron-electron interaction is coupled to a one-dimensional lead [103][104][105][106][107]. In our case, the single impurity is interpreted as the quantum dot, which is coupled to two quantum-point-contact leads.…”
Section: Theoretical Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The suggestion of the experimental studies in section 4.2.1 is that the additional, logarithmic, term in the resistance arises from confinement-enhanced of the electron-electron interaction [38]. For this reason, we have formulated [40,102] a manybody description of transport in open dots that is based on the idea of the Anderson system, in which a single impurity level with an on-site electron-electron interaction is coupled to a one-dimensional lead [103][104][105][106][107]. In our case, the single impurity is interpreted as the quantum dot, which is coupled to two quantum-point-contact leads.…”
Section: Theoretical Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To calculate transport properties from this model, we consider the diagonal non-equilibrium (due the non-constant chemical potential) many-body density-matrix. For numerical reasons, the continuum of k-states is discretized in our simulations, and we further employ a mean-field approach for the calculation of occupation numbers for statenumbers larger than 16 (The discretization in k-space must be chosen such that the resulting energy-spacing is small compared to k B T [102]). The current flowing through the system (and hence the conductance) can then be expressed in terms of the single-particle transmission probability (with its Fano-type resonance) and the occupation numbers [102].…”
Section: Theoretical Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…6 A description of the quantum transport in quantum dots is often based on model Hamiltonians containing phenomenological parameters such as coupling strengths or charging constants. [7][8][9] In many cases it is not always straightforward to relate quantitatively the above parameters to the physical processes they represent in the real system and sometimes it is not even obvious whether a model description is sufficient to capture the essential physics. At the same time, it is now well recognized that a detailed understanding and interpretation of the experiment might require a quantitative microscopical modeling of the system at hand, free from phenomenological parameters and not relying on model Hamiltonians which validity is poorly controlled.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This question was posed in several theoretical studies with somewhat conflicting conclusions [15][16][17][18]. For example, Brouwer and Aleiner [15] argued that the Coulomb interactions enhance the weak localization and increase conductance fluctuations, whereas Brouwer, Lamacraft, and Flensberg [16] questioned these conclusions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%