2003
DOI: 10.1088/0022-3727/36/20/001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A model for magnetic flux leakage signal predictions

Abstract: An analytical model was developed to determine the length of a surface-breaking defect along the direction of the applied field when using the magnetic flux leakage (MFL) non-destructive technique. The theoretical model fits the experimental MFL results from simulated defects. The extreme positions of the normal magnetic leakage field component were subsequently used for a quantitative evaluation of the defect length. Permeability variations were neglected by employing a flux density close to sample saturation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(27 reference statements)
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Percentage of the error for this single cylindrical hole is 0.62 %. The diameter estimated using analytical expression proposed by Mandache and Clapham [8] was 15.7 mm whose percentage error is 1.87 %. Proposed analytical expression has minimum error percentage.…”
Section: A Mfl Signals For Single Holesmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Percentage of the error for this single cylindrical hole is 0.62 %. The diameter estimated using analytical expression proposed by Mandache and Clapham [8] was 15.7 mm whose percentage error is 1.87 %. Proposed analytical expression has minimum error percentage.…”
Section: A Mfl Signals For Single Holesmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Four different types of geometry were experimentally investigated and they validated the analytical model with the experimental results. Constant lift-off is considered and the lift-off studies have MEASUREMENT SCIENCE REVIEW Journal homepage: http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/msr ISSN 1335 -8871 not been performed [8]. Dutta et al proposed an analytical model by accounting the variation of surface magnetic charge density for defect surfaces oblique to the direction of applied field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the following derivation, it is assumed that a Dipolar magnetic charge (DMC) is developed on the defect faces intersecting the exciting magnetic field as a result of its interaction with the excitation field as described in [3] and [5]. Moreover, local variations in magnetisation and permeability were avoided by assuming high magnetic excitation, corresponding to the saturation region of the material.…”
Section: Magnetic Flux Leakage Analytical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data obtained through the in-situ inspection of the specimen in literature are compared with the MFL profile generated by the calibrated samples. Recording the pattern of the leakage profile for the known defect in forward approach is not necessary when the dipole model is considered [2], [7]. Zatsepin et al (1966) introduced an analytical model using the point or strip of dipole for rectangular shape defect [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%