1973
DOI: 10.1007/bf00022629
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A model for incongruity in intimate partner relationships

Abstract: A model for incongruity in intimate partner relationships is described . The model is tested with results from earlier research on intimate partner relationships in plants and these results are reinterpreted . It is demonstrated that in relationships between partners from different populations incongruity, i .e . non-functioning of a partner relationship resulting from a lack of genetic information in one partner about the other, plays a major role, while that of incompatibility is secondary or absent . Sexual… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
59
0
3

Year Published

1986
1986
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
(93 reference statements)
2
59
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…J. regia is native to the Middle East, whereas J. nigra is native to the eastern United States, and the lack of fertilization between such taxa as these with a history of isolation can be explained in terms of a non-functioning of the pollen-pistil recognition systems. This has been called incongruity (Haghighi and Ascher 1988;Hogenboom 1973Hogenboom , 1984, i.e., the lack of critical information in one partner about aspects of the other due to the absence of opportunity for co-evolution of male gametophytes and pistils (Ascher 1986).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…J. regia is native to the Middle East, whereas J. nigra is native to the eastern United States, and the lack of fertilization between such taxa as these with a history of isolation can be explained in terms of a non-functioning of the pollen-pistil recognition systems. This has been called incongruity (Haghighi and Ascher 1988;Hogenboom 1973Hogenboom , 1984, i.e., the lack of critical information in one partner about aspects of the other due to the absence of opportunity for co-evolution of male gametophytes and pistils (Ascher 1986).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This phenomenon has been proposed to occur from a lack of genetic information in one of the partners of a given genotypic combination about either the structure or the physiology of the other partner (Hogenboom 1973), or for pistil recognition of pollen with a foreign origin (Kermicle and Evans 2010). CI can be either unilateral or bilateral, depending on whether a given genotypic combination is, respectively, compatible in only one direction or in both directions of the cross.…”
Section: Cross-incompatibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The successful completion of a series of sequential events following pollination requires a perfect blend of co-ordination between genes and gene complexes of pollen and the ovule parents (Hogenboom 1973). The present investigation was mainly focused on the rate of pollen tube growth and structural abnormalities of alien pollen on the cultivated pistils to understand how the reproductive isolation barriers operate on pollen tube pene-2008 tration in different stages of pistils.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%