2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.05.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A model for European Biogenic Volatile Organic Compound emissions: Software development and first validation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
41
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
3
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the climatological simulations, the biomass burning emissions and biogenic VOC emissions exhibit a strong seasonal cycle with higher emissions in the summer and lower emissions in the winter. Biogenic emissions approach zero during the winter with summer emission rates nearly two orders of magnitude higher than winter, consistent with other emissions studies in Europe (Poupkou et al, 2010;Steinbrecher et al, 2009). …”
Section: Emissions Inventoriessupporting
confidence: 90%
“…For the climatological simulations, the biomass burning emissions and biogenic VOC emissions exhibit a strong seasonal cycle with higher emissions in the summer and lower emissions in the winter. Biogenic emissions approach zero during the winter with summer emission rates nearly two orders of magnitude higher than winter, consistent with other emissions studies in Europe (Poupkou et al, 2010;Steinbrecher et al, 2009). …”
Section: Emissions Inventoriessupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Both models overestimate the observed data, and MEGAN results have a larger difference in this station. Nevertheless, the results are in agreement with Poupkou et al (2010) concluding an average level of uncertainty within a factor of 4 for isoprene estimations in Europe. In addition, it should also be emphasized that the relatively coarse spatial resolution applied in DEHM in these simulations is not able to well represent the high spatio-temporal variation in the isoprene concentrations.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Isoprene Concentrationssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…A number of studies have compared the isoprene models before incorporating the modules into CTMs on both global (Arneth et al, 2011) and regional (Wiedinmyer et al, 2008;Lam et al, 2011;Poupkou et al, 2010) scales. Arneth et al (2011) found agreement in the spatial distribution, interannual variability and total emissions as simulated by the three global isoprene emission models of MEGAN, LPJ-GUESS and BVOCEM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particulate matter emissions from natural sources (windblown dust and sea salt aerosol) and biogenic volatile organic compounds from vegetation are estimated using the Natural Emission MOdel NEMO version 1 (Markakis et al, 2009;Poupkou et al, 2010;Markakis, 2010) driven by the WRF meteorology. The Model for the Spatial and Temporal Distribution of Emissions (MOSESS) (Markakis et al, 2013) was applied for the calculation of spatially and temporally disaggregated and chemically speciated anthropogenic emission data of the following pollutants: CO, NO x , SO 2 , NH 3 , NMVOC, PM 10 and PM 2.5 .…”
Section: The Comprehensive Air Quality Model With Extensions (Camx)mentioning
confidence: 99%