2009
DOI: 10.5688/aj730587
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Model for Continuing Pharmacy Education

Abstract: Objective. To develop and implement a continuing pharmacy education (CPE) program at Kaiser Permanente Colorado (KPCO) Design. To address the continuing education needs of its diverse pharmacy staff, an internal continuing pharmacy education (CPE) program was developed. The pharmacy department became an accredited provider by the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE). Live, interactive, and evidence-based CPE programs, presented by highly qualified internal staff members, utilized videoconferenci… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, some Lebanese pharmacists are still not convinced about the usefulness of CE, opposite to the attitude of US pharmacists who perceived mandatory CE as acceptable more than 30 years ago, and to the majority of Irish pharmacists (84%) who agreed that engaging in CE was essential for all practicing pharmacists 19,25-27. Later on, a study conducted in Colorado in 2009 showed that only 10% of the pharmacists showed lack of interest in the live CE program while in Massachusetts (2012), all the surveyed pharmacists showed motivation for CE 21,26. Efforts should be made to increase awareness of the CE system and familiarity with technology, as shown in other countries 6,28…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, some Lebanese pharmacists are still not convinced about the usefulness of CE, opposite to the attitude of US pharmacists who perceived mandatory CE as acceptable more than 30 years ago, and to the majority of Irish pharmacists (84%) who agreed that engaging in CE was essential for all practicing pharmacists 19,25-27. Later on, a study conducted in Colorado in 2009 showed that only 10% of the pharmacists showed lack of interest in the live CE program while in Massachusetts (2012), all the surveyed pharmacists showed motivation for CE 21,26. Efforts should be made to increase awareness of the CE system and familiarity with technology, as shown in other countries 6,28…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Driesen et al [14] noted that there is no global model in place for lifelong learning. Nevertheless, various models have been outlined for CE or CPD including assessment [15], learning at work [16], reflection [17], peer review [18], and specialization [19]. Formats used include face-to-face, distance learning which includes sent written material to review, and online learning, including webinars or e-learning activities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Twenty-two studies [13,16,19,22,23,26,[30][31][32][33][34]39,40,[43][44][45]48,50,[52][53][54][55] provided analysis of implementation costs in eLearning without comparison to other learning platforms.…”
Section: Studies Describing Elearning Costs Without a Comparatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite these deficiencies, these studies provide varying means of cost calculation across different forms of instructional design. [13] No explicit cost methodology/technique described 26 2075 80 Blended Butler et al [16] No explicit cost methodology/technique described 394 23,000 53 Asynchronous Downer et al [19] Provided aggregate cost per leaner 0.04 N/A b 1,989,713 Asynchronous Grayson et al [22] Reported overall cost per learner 1453 N/A 787 Asynchronous Kaufman [26] Provided cost modeling approach N/A N/A N/A Asynchronous Hardwick et al [23] Use of online course deemed lower cost than face-to-face problem-based learning 23 10,000 393 Asynchronous Likic et al [29] Only costs of physical implementation 137 5250 35 Blended Manring et al [31] No explicit cost methodology/technique described 0.07 610 8120 Asynchronous McConnell et al [32] No explicit cost methodology/technique described…”
Section: Studies Describing Elearning Costs Without a Comparatormentioning
confidence: 99%