2012
DOI: 10.1071/as11003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Model for Contact Binary EP Andromedae

Abstract: This paper presents the first comprehensive study of the EP And system, a contact binary. In this work the solution of the standard V light curve was obtained using the PHOEBE program (version 0.3c). Absolute parameters of the stellar components were then determined, enabling us to discuss the structure and evolutionary status of the close binary EP And. The times of minima data ('OÀC curve') were analyzed. It was found that a third body with a period of 41.20 yr and mass 0.15 M } is orbiting around the system… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 3 lists the light-curve sets for EP And analyzed in this paper and the standard deviations (σ) of a single observation. Although the binary parameters have been reported by Pribulla et al (2001) and Manzoori (2012), their solutions with q <1.0 do not correspond to our high-precision observations of 2008, showing a total eclipse at primary minimum and hence implying q >1.0. To resolve this confusion, we analyzed the light curves of EP And in a manner similar to that for the overcontact systems AR Boo (Lee et al 2009c) and GW Cep (Lee et al 2010) using the so-called q-search procedure.…”
Section: New Long-term Ccd Photometrycontrasting
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Table 3 lists the light-curve sets for EP And analyzed in this paper and the standard deviations (σ) of a single observation. Although the binary parameters have been reported by Pribulla et al (2001) and Manzoori (2012), their solutions with q <1.0 do not correspond to our high-precision observations of 2008, showing a total eclipse at primary minimum and hence implying q >1.0. To resolve this confusion, we analyzed the light curves of EP And in a manner similar to that for the overcontact systems AR Boo (Lee et al 2009c) and GW Cep (Lee et al 2010) using the so-called q-search procedure.…”
Section: New Long-term Ccd Photometrycontrasting
confidence: 90%
“…From a quadratic least-squares fit, they reported a period increase with a rate of +1.16×10 −7 d yr −1 . Recently, Manzoori (2012) claimed that two periodicities of 41.2 yr and 11.7 yr, superimposed on the upward parabolic variation, exist in the timing residuals. As the first step for ephemeris computations, we applied a periodogram analysis to the complete dataset using the PERIOD04 program (Lenz & Breger 2005).…”
Section: Orbital Period Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Additionally, the length of the obtained cyclic period seems to be too long as to be interpreted as a magnetic activity cycle. For example, this period for the sun is 11 yr, for U Sge 9.5 yr (Manzoori 2007), for U Cep 16.4 yr (Manzoori 2008), for Algol 32 yr (Soderhjelm 1980), for UV Leo 24.3 yr (Manzoori 2012a), for SW Cyg 27.9 yr (Manzoori 2007), for RT And 11.9 yr (Manzoori 2009), for EP And 11.72 yr (Manzoori 2012b). …”
Section: Magnetic Activity Cyclementioning
confidence: 98%