2012
DOI: 10.3139/146.110797
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A model for co-clusters and their strengthening in Al–Cu–Mg based alloys: a comparison with experimental data

Abstract: A model for the thermodynamics of and strengthening due to Cu-Mg co-clusters in Al-CuMg based alloys is analysed and tested. The formulation uses a single interaction enthalpy between dissimilar alloying elements (e.g. Cu and Mg atoms in an Al-Cu-Mg based alloy) combined with the configurational entropy. The metastable solvus in Al-Cu-Mg based alloys is calculated. Recently published small angle X-ray scattering experiments, 3 dimensional atom probe and yield strength data on these type of alloys support the m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…clusters indicates strengthening effect that is the main strengthening mechanism in the alloy that contributes to high specific strengths and modulus. This finding confirms that there is direct relationship between strength and the amount of co-clusters formed [32]. precipitates is stable at 28.14nm before hot rolling and rises to 4µm during hot rolling then stabilizes at 27.628nm after hot rolling.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…clusters indicates strengthening effect that is the main strengthening mechanism in the alloy that contributes to high specific strengths and modulus. This finding confirms that there is direct relationship between strength and the amount of co-clusters formed [32]. precipitates is stable at 28.14nm before hot rolling and rises to 4µm during hot rolling then stabilizes at 27.628nm after hot rolling.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…6: for this reaction n appears to be constant at 2.5 independent of T tr /T s . Also this is consistent with the above interpretation as for these short range ordered structures the change in free energy is determined by the Cu-Mg bonds formed [39,40,44,45] and hence only continued formation (nucleation) of Cu-Mg bonds can reduce the free energy of the system.…”
Section: The Relation Between Reaction Exponent N Nucleation Undercsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…the precipitate phase) in the alloy, T s . T s was estimated from solvus data of the Ni-Al system [37], data of the Pb-Ca system [38], TTT plots of precipitation in Al-Sc [25], the thermodynamic model for Cu-Mg co-clusters in Al-Cu-Mg alloys [39,40], the Fe-C system phase diagram, the Al-Si phase diagram and the estimated solvus of CrN by Weaver [24]. Data on T s thus obtained is included in Table 1.…”
Section: The Relation Between Reaction Exponent N Nucleation Undercmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Presence co-clusters indicates strengthening effect that is the main strengthening mechanism in the alloy that contributes to high specific strengths and modulus. This finding confirms that there is direct relationship between strength and the amount of co-clusters formed[32].…”
supporting
confidence: 85%