2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2015.02.054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A model for aircraft evaluation to support strategic decisions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Chou et al (2011) found that, assurance and reliability were the important criteria of service quality. Bruno et al (2015) assessment aircraft for supporting of strategic decisions, finding of this paper showed that factor of cabin luggage compartment size in the best factor. Rezaei et al (2014) evaluated and selected the supplier in the airline retail industry, finding of this article indicated that financial stability is significant criteria in supplier selection.…”
Section: Distribution Based On Ahp and Fuzzy-ahpmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Chou et al (2011) found that, assurance and reliability were the important criteria of service quality. Bruno et al (2015) assessment aircraft for supporting of strategic decisions, finding of this paper showed that factor of cabin luggage compartment size in the best factor. Rezaei et al (2014) evaluated and selected the supplier in the airline retail industry, finding of this article indicated that financial stability is significant criteria in supplier selection.…”
Section: Distribution Based On Ahp and Fuzzy-ahpmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…We can classify the conducted studies according to the method and the type of aircraft they examined. For example, Even Swaps Method ( Dožić and Kalić, 2013 ), Roskam (1990) five-step approach method ( Harasani, 2006 ), NAIADE Method ( Gomes et al, 2014 ), AHP method ( Dožić and Kalić, 2014 ; Teoh and Khoo, 2015 ), Fuzzy set theory method ( Bruno et al, 2015 ), Fuzzy logic and Even Swaps Method ( Dožić and Kalić, 2015a ), ESM, Regression, Fuzzy logic Method ( Dožić and Kalić, 2015b ), AHP and Fuzzy Set Theory method ( Bruno et al, 2015 ), FAHP and FANP method ( Ozdemir and Basligil, 2016 ), TOPSIS method ( Kiracı and Bakır, 2018b ), AHP, COPRAS and MOORA method ( Kiracı and Bakır, 2018a ) and Linear Physical Programming method ( Ilgın, 2019 ) have all been used for the selection, evaluation or ranking of aircraft types with different specifications and sizes.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be seen in Figure 3 that the aircraft icons on are the waypoints inserted to avoid collision. The newly inserted waypoint can be determined using (15). A time constant is introduced, without which the safety distance envelope may be violated (i.e., = 0):…”
Section: Spatial Grid Partitioning System and CD Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each small fixed-wing aircraft must follow its planned fourdimensional (4D) trajectory, which can be defined by a series of sequential waypoints recorded as three-dimensional (3D) spatial information with corresponding timestamps 2 Journal of Advanced Transportation [8][9][10][11][12]. Time and space deviations in one trajectory may affect other 4D trajectories because of the crowded spatiotemporal connectivity between trajectories [13][14][15]. This domino effect makes management very challenging.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%