The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-39259-7_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Model-Driven Approach to Specifying and Monitoring Controlled Experiments in Software Engineering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Freire et al [11] presented a customizable model-driven environment for supporting and conducting controlled experiments in Software Engineering. The approach is composed of a domain-specific language for modeling the domain of controlled experiments, model-driven transformations that map abstractions from the domain-specific language to workflow models for each participant in the experiment, and a workflow execution environment that guides experiment execution and monitoring.…”
Section: Empirical Software Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Freire et al [11] presented a customizable model-driven environment for supporting and conducting controlled experiments in Software Engineering. The approach is composed of a domain-specific language for modeling the domain of controlled experiments, model-driven transformations that map abstractions from the domain-specific language to workflow models for each participant in the experiment, and a workflow execution environment that guides experiment execution and monitoring.…”
Section: Empirical Software Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Any Abstract Component subclass shares some characteristic, such as a label. Unlike other solutions (such as ExpDSL [21] and eSEE [10] , a questionnaire component can have more than one label. Allowing many labels for a same component allows researchers to specify their questionnaire in different languages [39] .…”
Section: Questionnaire Packagementioning
confidence: 99%