2013
DOI: 10.1109/tr.2013.2273040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Model-Driven Approach for the Failure Data Analysis of Multiple Repairable Systems Without Information on Individual Sequences

Abstract: This paper proposes a model-driven approach which is able to analyze the failure data of multiple repairable systems when no information on the individual sequences is available, thus overcoming the limitations of the previous models proposed in the literature. The proposed approach can analyze the failure data of systems subject to minimal, imperfect, or worse repairs; and is developed under a general form of the baseline failure intensity. Both failure-and time-truncation are considered, provided that the tr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(66 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Usually the model-based approach makes use of mathematical models for the monitored system, but is difficult to model for a complex system (e.g. aircraft engines) [13], [14]. The experience-based prognostic approach uses probabilistic or stochastic models for the degradation by taking into account the data and the knowledge accumulated through experience, but the results are often not accurate enough to accommodate the engine's dynamic complex processes [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Usually the model-based approach makes use of mathematical models for the monitored system, but is difficult to model for a complex system (e.g. aircraft engines) [13], [14]. The experience-based prognostic approach uses probabilistic or stochastic models for the degradation by taking into account the data and the knowledge accumulated through experience, but the results are often not accurate enough to accommodate the engine's dynamic complex processes [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And the random shock process is often described as a homogeneous Poisson process [13]. According to the various failure mechanisms of hard failure, the following shock models mainly exist: extreme shock [14], cumulative shock [15], δ shock [16], and hybrid shock [17]. As an example, Sandia National Laboratories conducted reliability tests on MEMS parts [18].…”
Section: Introductionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And the random shock process is often described as a homogeneous Poisson process [13]. According to the various failure mechanisms of hard failure, the following shock models mainly exist: extreme shock [14], cumulative shock [15], 𝛿𝛿 shock [16], and hybrid shock [17]. As an example, Sandia National Laboratories conducted reliability tests on MEMS parts [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%