2013 51st Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing (Allerton) 2013
DOI: 10.1109/allerton.2013.6736631
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A model checking framework for linear time invariant switching systems using structural systems analysis

Abstract: This paper introduces the concept of structural hybrid systems to address, as a particular case, the model checking problem of switching (possible large scale) linear time invariant systems. Within the proposed setup, we provide necessary conditions to ensure properties such as controllability, at each time. We show that such model checking controllability properties can be implemented using efficient algorithms (with polynomial complexity). An example, based on the IEEE 5-bus power system, is presented which … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Theorem 1 ( [5], [15]): Let D(Ā) = (X , E X ,X ) be the state digraph and its DAG representation with k SCCs, de- Finally, we present some additional concepts necessary to study the structure of the network topology constraints and its robustness to transmission line failures in Section IV. For both directed and undirected graph, with some abuse of notation, we denote an edge from vertex…”
Section: Preliminaries and Terminologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Theorem 1 ( [5], [15]): Let D(Ā) = (X , E X ,X ) be the state digraph and its DAG representation with k SCCs, de- Finally, we present some additional concepts necessary to study the structure of the network topology constraints and its robustness to transmission line failures in Section IV. For both directed and undirected graph, with some abuse of notation, we denote an edge from vertex…”
Section: Preliminaries and Terminologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, to preclude the system to lose structural controllability, two strategies are possible: (i) reallocate resources such as inputs to ensure that the dynamical system associated with islands formed after transmission line failures is structurally controllable, see [5] for details; or (ii) redesign the network topology, by adding transmission lines, to ensure that the structural switching system representing the dynamics of the electric power grid has a pre-specified level of robustness. In the next subsection, we explore the latter scenario in further detail.…”
Section: Necessary and Sufficient Conditions To Ensure Probustnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The current work also differs from [23], [24], where the structural minimum controllability problem aimed to ensure structural controllability for each mode of the switched continuoustime linear system; note that this conservative notion contrasts with the controllability definition considered in the present manuscript. In [20] the structural minimal controllability problem for linear time-invariant systems was considered under heterogenous cost, i.e., the variables actuated can incur in different costs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%