2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-12214-4_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Model-Based Methodology to Formalize Specifications of Railway Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ScOLA is an extension of the formalism of SDLg (Issad et al 2014). It introduces a novel approach for system specifications.…”
Section: Definition Of Scolamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ScOLA is an extension of the formalism of SDLg (Issad et al 2014). It introduces a novel approach for system specifications.…”
Section: Definition Of Scolamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Up to now, MBSA has been widely used in the fields of aviation [9], railways [10], automotives [11], and other safety-critical systems [12]. During the process of MBSA, system engineers and safety analysts share a common system model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this article, we present a scenario‐oriented modeling methodology dedicated to the analysis and the formalization of complex railway system specifications. This methodology relies on the SCOLA (a Scenario Oriented LAnguage) semiformal notation to describe scenarios and on a formal execution model described in the AltaRica 3.0 modeling language (see, e.g., Refs. ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We decided therefore to create SCOLA, a domain‐specific modeling notation dedicated to our reverse engineering purpose, that is, to the representation of railway scenarios. SCOLA relies on a simple process algebra (in the vein of Calculus of Communicating Systems [CCS] and Communicating Sequential Processes [CSP]) to specify behaviors and on System Structure Modeling Language (S2ML) to structure models and to describe systems architectures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%