2007
DOI: 10.1145/1230800.1230805
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A model-based extensible framework for efficient application design using FPGA

Abstract: For an FPGA designer, several choices are available in terms of target FPGA devices, IP-cores, algorithms, synthesis options, runtime reconfiguration, degrees of parallelism, among others, while implementing a design. Evaluation of design alternatives in the early stages of the design cycle is important because the choices made can have a critical impact on the performance of the final design. However, a large number of alternatives not only results in a large number of designs, but also makes it a hard proble… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mohanty and Prasanna [18] proposed kernel-level modeling of FPGA algorithms, which is similar to CMD, but their work focused on power-consumption prediction and did not provide clock-frequency prediction methods. Xilinx System Generator [19] shares the same abstract-modeling approach, but, again, clock-frequency prediction is not provided.…”
Section: Background and Related Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mohanty and Prasanna [18] proposed kernel-level modeling of FPGA algorithms, which is similar to CMD, but their work focused on power-consumption prediction and did not provide clock-frequency prediction methods. Xilinx System Generator [19] shares the same abstract-modeling approach, but, again, clock-frequency prediction is not provided.…”
Section: Background and Related Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A hierarchical model-based framework for FPGA development in RC is presented by Mohanty and Prasanna [2007] which includes support for evaluation of design alternatives early in the development process. The framework integrates a high-level performance estimator (HiPerE) and a design space exploration tool (DESERT) for efficient evaluation of candidate mappings against user-specified performance requirements onto system-on-chip (SoC) architectures described using the Generic Model (GenM) [Mohanty et al 2002].…”
Section: Background and Related Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The framework integrates a high-level performance estimator (HiPerE) and a design space exploration tool (DESERT) for efficient evaluation of candidate mappings against user-specified performance requirements onto system-on-chip (SoC) architectures described using the Generic Model (GenM) [Mohanty et al 2002]. While the framework in Mohanty and Prasanna [2007] overlaps to some degree with this research, there are several key differences. First, the framework in Mohanty and Prasanna [2007] is intended to serve as a development environment, unlike RCML which is a modeling environment designed for estimation-level modeling of RC systems.…”
Section: Background and Related Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A hierarchical model-based framework for FPGA development is presented by Mohanty and Prasanna [2007] intended to support evaluation of design alternatives early in the design process. The framework integrates a high-level performance estimator (HiPerE) and a design space exploration tool (DESERT) for efficient evaluation of candidate mappings against user-specified performance requirements onto architectures that can be described using the Generic Model (GenM) for System-on-Chip (SoC) architectures [Mohanty et al 2002].…”
Section: Background and Related Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%