Proceedings of the 2011 American Control Conference 2011
DOI: 10.1109/acc.2011.5991196
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Model-based estimator of engine cylinder pressure imbalance for combustion feedback control applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the closest calibration cycle, which corresponds to the minimum found from equation (11), the calibration peak pressure error ∈ is computed (as a percentage) i.e. ∈ = 100*abs(( ̂− )/ ) (12) where ̂ is the peak pressure predicted using the calibrated model (Equation (1)) with the 'closest' calibration kinematics, and is the corresponding measured (calibration data) peak pressure. If the magnitude of ∈ exceeds a chosen criterion ∆ i.e.…”
Section: Data Acquisition Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For the closest calibration cycle, which corresponds to the minimum found from equation (11), the calibration peak pressure error ∈ is computed (as a percentage) i.e. ∈ = 100*abs(( ̂− )/ ) (12) where ̂ is the peak pressure predicted using the calibrated model (Equation (1)) with the 'closest' calibration kinematics, and is the corresponding measured (calibration data) peak pressure. If the magnitude of ∈ exceeds a chosen criterion ∆ i.e.…”
Section: Data Acquisition Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before showing cylinder pressure results under transient engine operating conditions, a convergence study was undertaken using measured steady-state engine data to establish a suitable number of terms to include in Chebychev expansions in equation (1) convergence study of the 'calibration peak pressure error' given by Equation (12). The discrete time interval chosen was 0.1ms.…”
Section: Testing the Model Using Measured Engine Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, the intake gas properties may need to be estimated for real applications on production engines. In [24] and [25], Al-Durra et al and Stockar et al have employed a sliding mode observer and a model-order reduction method to predict the in-cylinder pressure. Although these methods can predict the pressure at IVC accurately, they disregard heat transfer and are more complex which makes these methods more challenging for use in CA50 controller design.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An ANN fed with crank speed (at 1800 rpm), motored-engine pressures, and spark advance, was tested in [15] using a heat-release model for cylinder pressure, to give results of 5 -10% accuracy on Pmax. Crank speed for a four-cylinder Diesel engine was also used in [16] to exploit sliding-mode observer predictions of Pmax within 2% and θmax within ± 2°. A physical torque model by contrast was used in [17] and te sted on a 2-litre 4…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%