2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2012.09.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A model-based approach to select case sites for walkability audits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, our 1 km network neighborhood buffer may not accurately reflect physical activity areas for different urban settings and sociodemographic subgroups. Indeed other walkability indices using geographic information systems data exist and are based on density, diversity, and design [75], such as the walkscore [76] that may capture a larger geographic area surrounding the participants’ homes. However, the quality of these measures depends on the accuracy of the data and they often include only limited snapshots in time that may not coincide with the study period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, our 1 km network neighborhood buffer may not accurately reflect physical activity areas for different urban settings and sociodemographic subgroups. Indeed other walkability indices using geographic information systems data exist and are based on density, diversity, and design [75], such as the walkscore [76] that may capture a larger geographic area surrounding the participants’ homes. However, the quality of these measures depends on the accuracy of the data and they often include only limited snapshots in time that may not coincide with the study period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, prior research on auditing tools has been mainly focused on four axes. First, to analyze statistically inter-rater reliability [32,33]; second, to assess the effectiveness of virtual audit tools in comparison to in-field auditing [34,35]; third, to examine optimum sampling techniques [9,36]; and fourth, to validate their performance in quantifying effectively activity-friendly environments [1,6]. However, micro-level walkability auditing tools deal with several barriers that limit their power [34,37].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, previous research has shown that microscale walkability concepts are suitable tools to measure activityfriendly places and to support planners in designing healthier and livable communities [1,8]. Still, microscale variables present challenges in data collection, as they require systematic observation of pedestrian streetscapes and in turn require a time-consuming and labor-intensive research protocol [9]. For instance, Day et al [10] reported that a 160item list of a street observation instrument required about 20 minutes of fieldwork per segment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brown y Werner, 2009;Park, Deakin, y Jang, 2013). Por otra parte, y en base a los trabajos internacionales analizados, es frecuente la asociación de la distancia con factores relativos al entorno urbano como la propia tipología de entorno (Seneviratne, Boletín de la Asociación de Geógrafos Españoles, 79, 2472, 1-25 1985), el diseño del mismo (El-Geneidy et al, 2014;O'Sullivan & Morrall, 1996) o los usos del suelo (Aultman-Hall, Roorda, & Baetz, 1997;Moniruzzaman, Páez, Paez, & Páez, 2012). Estos factores pueden hacer que la distancia peatonal varíe, dando lugar, como sugieren Park, Deakin, y Jang (2013), a que en los lugares con una alta calidad del entorno la distancia se incremente, mientras que por el contrario, lugares con una baja calidad del entorno, la distancia peatonal decrezca.…”
Section: Antecedentesunclassified