The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-015-6864-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A model-based approach for online estimation of surface waviness in roll grinding

Abstract: Vibrations onset represents a paramount issue in all grinding processes. The related surface defects appear in the form of micrometric waviness that decreases the finishing quality and in some cases the functionality of the ground workpieces: sometimes, these defects can be also marked on the grinding wheel surface. This paper presents an online model-based approach to identify and quantify the level of waviness starting from multiple acceleration measurements, allowing a continuous monitoring of wheel and/or … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(31 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Surface waviness is a positively correlated relationship with grinding depth, and the influence mechanism of the grinding velocity and workpiece speed on surface waviness is more complicated [20]; there is obvious interaction between the grinding velocity and workpiece rotational speed. Via matching process parameters with machine dynamics, more stable machining results can be obtained [21] and [22].…”
Section: Fig 8 Test Results Of Roughness and Wavinessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surface waviness is a positively correlated relationship with grinding depth, and the influence mechanism of the grinding velocity and workpiece speed on surface waviness is more complicated [20]; there is obvious interaction between the grinding velocity and workpiece rotational speed. Via matching process parameters with machine dynamics, more stable machining results can be obtained [21] and [22].…”
Section: Fig 8 Test Results Of Roughness and Wavinessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to minimize the effect of uncertainties on the Euclidean norm of the solution vector, the input/output pair has to minimize the ||•|| 2 -condition number of the identification matrix in Eq. (19). Since the condition number reflects the influence of the input excitation on the grinding process, the most suited input/output candidates are the process DoFs: the co-located FRFswhen input and output DoFs are the sameusually entail the maximum displacement amplitude.…”
Section: Closed-loop Frf Measurement and Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [18] grinding tests with variable workpiece dynamics were executed and compared to numerical simulations, in predicting cutting stability. In this scenario, process constants identification is important and can also support advanced schemes for wheel and workpiece waviness monitoring during chatter onset [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The estimation of the surface waviness is directly used by the described process controller, but also constitutes a significant realtime surface quality indication for machine operators. The so-called "waviness observer module" (WavObs), presented by Parenti et al [29] has been integrated in the process controller as a brick of the process monitoring layer. This algorithm estimates workpiece and wheel waviness in traverse grinding by adopting a dynamic model-based approach to process the acceleration signals captured on the machine.…”
Section: Waviness Observermentioning
confidence: 99%