2020 Prognostics and Health Management Conference (PHM-Besançon) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/phm-besancon49106.2020.00017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Model-Based Analysis of Crack Fault in a Two-Stage Spur Gear System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some phenomena, such as friction between gear tooth, gearbox housing, and backlash, are ignored by this model. The following notation was used in this study [25,26]…”
Section: Modeling Of Two Stages Gearboxmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some phenomena, such as friction between gear tooth, gearbox housing, and backlash, are ignored by this model. The following notation was used in this study [25,26]…”
Section: Modeling Of Two Stages Gearboxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some phenomena, such as friction between gear tooth, gearbox housing, and backlash, are ignored by this model. The following notation was used in this study [25,26]: We focused on the model response in the y direction, representing the effect of timevarying mesh stiffness, as the model response in the x direction is transient. According to Newton's second law and considering the previous assumptions, the torsional vibration dynamics equations of the two-stage spur gear are as follows: We focused on the model response in the y direction, representing the effect of timevarying mesh stiffness, as the model response in the x direction is transient.…”
Section: Modeling Of Two Stages Gearboxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dynamic modeling has always been an efficient tool to predict the response of motorgearbox systems under varying operating conditions. A set of models were proposed in the literature to simulate gearboxes and induction machine responses; among them, numerical models based on the finite element method (FEM) and analytical models based on the lumped parameter method (LPM) were the most popular ones [5][6][7][8][9]. FEM-based models generally provide more precise results and a high fidelity to the original system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%