2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2013.07.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A model and comparison of 4-wheel-drive fixed-chassis tractor rollover during Phase I

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…the distance corresponding to the scenario in which the CoG projection is on the baseline border (Type II instability; Figure 3). In this case, the instability of each part (Type I instability) is also evaluated by checking if the projection of the front and rear centres of mass fall inside or outside the proper stability triangle [13,14,9]. …”
Section: The Stability Simulatormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…the distance corresponding to the scenario in which the CoG projection is on the baseline border (Type II instability; Figure 3). In this case, the instability of each part (Type I instability) is also evaluated by checking if the projection of the front and rear centres of mass fall inside or outside the proper stability triangle [13,14,9]. …”
Section: The Stability Simulatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the use of the energetic approach in [12] allowed to analyse the different initial rollover conditions of tractors and to evaluate the energy available at rollover start. However, the most recent works analysing the stability of agricultural machines [13,5,9,14] use an analytical-Newtonian approach combined with a kineto-static approach based on rigid bodies: the rollover initiation angle of conventional farm tractors fitted with front-axle pivot is studied in [13] while the articulated tractors are treated in [14,5]. The approach followed in the kinematic description of these two types of tractors is basically the same: a first (anterior) body groups the front axle and wheels and a second (posterior) body the remaining part of the machine and the rear wheels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As highlighted in other studies focused on the stability of wheeled non-articulated systems with a 2-DoF steering joint (Baker & Guzzomi, 2013;Guzzomi, 2012;Scarlett et al, 2006), the second DoF of the central joint (roll) is directly involved in the overall stability. Therefore, it is necessary to consider not only the footprint given by the four wheels and the related quadrilateral stability polygon of the vehicle (type II instability), but also the position of the joint.…”
Section: Wheeled Articulated Systemsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Pioneering investigations on the mechanism of tractor rollover have established fundamental theories explaining how a tractor behaves under certain ground conditions. The mathematical models thus generated further provide the basic concepts of consideration for tractors in dynamic, static, and quasi-static states [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] . Indicators of tractor stability obtained from mathematical models provide a simple way of describing vehicle stability.…”
Section: Introduction mentioning
confidence: 99%