2019
DOI: 10.3233/fi-2019-1770
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Modal Logic of a Truth Definition for Finite Models*

Abstract: The property of being true in almost all finite, initial segments of the standard model for arithmetic is a Σ 0 2-complete property. Thus, it admits a kind of a weak truth definition. We define such an arithmetical predicate. Then we define its modal logic SL and prove a completeness theorem with respect to finite models semantics. The proof that SL is the modal logic of a weak truth definition for finite arithmetical models is based on an extension of SL by a fixpoint construction.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7 Nonetheless, already the T-sentences for atomic sentences in the language without the truth predicate-which are required to provide nontrivial axiomatizations of the truth predicate-have an impact on the modal logic of the theory and this impact cannot be immediately read off the axioms of the truth theory. In fact, we will show that such T-sentences force the modal logic of theories of Kripke-Feferman truth to comprise the axiom ✷ϕ ∧ ¬✷¬ϕ → ϕ (faith ✷ ) 5 Similarly, Czarnecki and Zdanowski [11] show the modal logic KDDc to be maximal. 6 We highlight, however, that our results will also apply to base theories weaker than I∆ 0 + Exp, such as Buss's S 1 2 or I∆ 0 + Ω 1 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 72%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…7 Nonetheless, already the T-sentences for atomic sentences in the language without the truth predicate-which are required to provide nontrivial axiomatizations of the truth predicate-have an impact on the modal logic of the theory and this impact cannot be immediately read off the axioms of the truth theory. In fact, we will show that such T-sentences force the modal logic of theories of Kripke-Feferman truth to comprise the axiom ✷ϕ ∧ ¬✷¬ϕ → ϕ (faith ✷ ) 5 Similarly, Czarnecki and Zdanowski [11] show the modal logic KDDc to be maximal. 6 We highlight, however, that our results will also apply to base theories weaker than I∆ 0 + Exp, such as Buss's S 1 2 or I∆ 0 + Ω 1 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 72%
“…A saturated set is, roughly, a nontrivial set of formulas closed under the particular logic whose completeness is at stake. 11 The detailed proof of the next claim is provided in Appendix B.…”
Section: Definitionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation